These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

604 related items for PubMed ID: 34071881

  • 1. Effectiveness of EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy versus EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration: A Retrospective Analysis.
    Kuraoka N, Hashimoto S, Matsui S, Terai S.
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 May 27; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 34071881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
    Yousri M, Abusinna E, Tahoun N, Okasha HH, El-Habashi AH.
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun 01; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
    Tian L, Tang AL, Zhang L, Liu XW, Li JB, Wang F, Shen SR, Wang XY.
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug 01; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Addition of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and On-Site Cytology to EUS-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Increases Procedure Time but Not Diagnostic Accuracy.
    Keswani RN, Krishnan K, Wani S, Keefer L, Komanduri S.
    Clin Endosc; 2014 May 01; 47(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 24944988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF, Larghi A, Bernardoni L, Parisi A, Frulloni L, Gabbrielli A, Parcesepe P, Scarpa A, Manfrin E.
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar 01; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the diagnosis of solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Wang J, Wu X, Yin P, Guo Q, Hou W, Li Y, Wang Y, Cheng B.
    Trials; 2016 Apr 12; 17():198. PubMed ID: 27071386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for preoperative pancreatic solid lesions.
    Fujita A, Ryozawa S, Tanisaka Y, Ogawa T, Suzuki M, Katsuda H, Tashima T, Araki R, Mizuide M.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2021 Feb 12; 56(2):188-192. PubMed ID: 33295211
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration versus fine-needle biopsy and impact of rapid on-site evaluation for pancreatic masses.
    de Moura DTH, McCarty TR, Jirapinyo P, Ribeiro IB, Hathorn KE, Madruga-Neto AC, Lee LS, Thompson CC.
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Jun 12; 8(6):E738-E747. PubMed ID: 32490158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study.
    Wong T, Pattarapuntakul T, Netinatsunton N, Ovartlarnporn B, Sottisuporn J, Chamroonkul N, Sripongpun P, Jandee S, Kaewdech A, Attasaranya S, Piratvisuth T.
    World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun 24; 20(1):215. PubMed ID: 35751053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Utility of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for diagnosing small subepithelial lesions (< 20 mm).
    Sekine M, Miura T, Fujiwara J, Uehara T, Asano T, Matsumoto S, Miyatani H, Mashima H.
    J Ultrasound; 2022 Mar 24; 25(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 33511507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. EUS-guided FNA and FNB after on-site cytological evaluation in gastric subepithelial tumors.
    Han JP, Lee TH, Hong SJ, Kim HK, Noh HM, Lee YN, Choi HJ.
    J Dig Dis; 2016 Sep 24; 17(9):582-587. PubMed ID: 27421815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A multicenter comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy using a Franseen needle versus conventional endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration to evaluate microsatellite instability in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.
    Takagi T, Sugimoto M, Imamura H, Takahata Y, Nakajima Y, Suzuki R, Konno N, Asama H, Sato Y, Irie H, Nakamura J, Takasumi M, Hashimoto M, Kato T, Kobashi R, Hashimoto Y, Shibukawa G, Marubashi S, Hikichi T, Ohira H.
    Clin Endosc; 2023 Jan 24; 56(1):107-113. PubMed ID: 36646425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 31.