These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


138 related items for PubMed ID: 34082461

  • 1. Comparing Simultaneous Electrocochleography and Auditory Brainstem Response Measurements Using Three Different Extratympanic Electrodes.
    Lefler SM, Kaf WA, Ferraro JA.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Jun; 32(6):339-346. PubMed ID: 34082461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Fast Click Rate Electrocochleography and Auditory Brainstem Response in Normal-Hearing Adults Using Continuous Loop Averaging Deconvolution.
    Kaf WA, Lewis KM, Yavuz E, Dixon SM, Van Ess M, Jamos AM, Delgado RE.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Jun; 38(2):244-254. PubMed ID: 27861251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Combined intra-operative monitoring of hearing by means of auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and transtympanic electrocochleography (ECochG) during surgery of intra- and extrameatal acoustic neurinomas.
    Schlake HP, Milewski C, Goldbrunner RH, Kindgen A, Riemann R, Helms J, Roosen K.
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2001 Oct; 143(10):985-95; discussion 995-6. PubMed ID: 11685605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Simultaneous Extratympanic Electrocochleography and Auditory Brainstem Responses Revisited.
    Minaya C, Atcherson SR.
    Audiol Res; 2015 Jan 21; 5(1):105. PubMed ID: 26557358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Tympanic ECochG and conventional ABR: a combined approach for the identification of wave I and the I-V interwave interval.
    Ferraro JA, Ferguson R.
    Ear Hear; 1989 Jun 21; 10(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 2744251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Minimum Detectable Differences in Electrocochleography Measurements: Bayesian-Based Predictions.
    Goodman SS, Lichtenhan JT, Jennings SG.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2023 Apr 21; 24(2):217-237. PubMed ID: 36795197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Using concha electrodes to measure cochlear microphonic waveforms and auditory brainstem responses.
    Zhang M.
    Trends Amplif; 2010 Dec 21; 14(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 21131635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Intraoperative neuromonitoring for superior semicircular canal dehiscence and hearing outcomes.
    Wenzel A, Ward BK, Ritzl EK, Gutierrez-Hernandez S, Della Santina CC, Minor LB, Carey JP.
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan 21; 36(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 25333320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of ABR amplitudes with TIPtrode and mastoid electrodes.
    Bauch CD, Olsen WO.
    Ear Hear; 1990 Dec 21; 11(6):463-7. PubMed ID: 2073982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.