These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
424 related items for PubMed ID: 34088570
21. Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility acetabular components: a systematic review. De Martino I, D'Apolito R, Soranoglou VG, Poultsides LA, Sculco PK, Sculco TP. Bone Joint J; 2017 Jan; 99-B(ASuppl1):18-24. PubMed ID: 28042114 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Is there a problem with modular dual mobility acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty at mid-term follow-up? Hernandez NM, Hinton ZW, Wu CJ, Lachiewicz PF, Ryan SP, Wellman SS. Bone Joint J; 2021 Jul; 103-B(7 Supple B):66-72. PubMed ID: 34192910 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. What Is the Outcome of the First Revision Procedure of Primary THA for Osteoarthritis? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. de Steiger RN, Lewis PL, Harris I, Lorimer MF, Graves SE. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct 01; 480(10):1952-1970. PubMed ID: 35980886 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Revision for Aseptic Loosening of Highly Porous Acetabular Components in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 20,993 Total Hip Replacements. Hoskins W, Rainbird S, Holder C, Graves SE, Bingham R. J Arthroplasty; 2022 Feb 01; 37(2):312-315. PubMed ID: 34699913 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The Use of Computer Navigation in Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated with a Reduced Rate of Revision for Dislocation: A Study of 6,912 Navigated THA Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Agarwal S, Eckhard L, Walter WL, Peng A, Hatton A, Donnelly B, de Steiger R. J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Oct 20; 103(20):1900-1905. PubMed ID: 34143758 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Risk factors and modes of failure in the modern dual mobility implant. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pai FY, Ma HH, Chou TA, Huang TW, Huang KC, Tsai SW, Chen CF, Chen WM. BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Jun 14; 22(1):541. PubMed ID: 34126990 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The association of surgical approach and bearing size and type with dislocation in total hip arthroplasty for acute hip fracture. Rogmark C, Nåtman J, Jobory A, Hailer NP, Cnudde P. Bone Joint J; 2022 Jul 14; 104-B(7):844-851. PubMed ID: 35775180 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Is There a Difference in Revision Risk Between Metal and Ceramic Heads on Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners? Cafri G, Paxton EW, Love R, Bini SA, Kurtz SM. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 May 14; 475(5):1349-1355. PubMed ID: 27385222 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients at High Risk for Dislocation. Harwin SF, Mistry JB, Chughtai M, Khlopas A, Gwam C, Newman JM, Higuera CA, Bonutti PM, Malkani AL, Kolisek FR, Delanois RE, Mont MA. Surg Technol Int; 2017 Jul 25; 30():251-258. PubMed ID: 28395391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. What is the failure rate of constrained liners in complex revision total hip arthroplasty? Unter Ecker N, Piakong P, Delgado G, Gehrke T, Citak M, Ohlmeier M. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Mar 25; 143(3):1671-1678. PubMed ID: 35377048 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparison of cemented femoral fixation via anterior versus posterior approach total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 60,739 total hip arthroplasties. Hoskins W, Corfield S, Peng Y, Graves SE, Bingham R. Hip Int; 2024 Jul 25; 34(4):442-451. PubMed ID: 38529902 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Revision total hip arthroplasty with a Kerboull plate: comparative outcomes using standard versus dual mobility cups. Assi C, Caton J, Fawaz W, Samaha C, Yammine K. Int Orthop; 2019 Oct 25; 43(10):2245-2251. PubMed ID: 30370452 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]