These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

226 related items for PubMed ID: 34132865

  • 1. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacral colpopexy plus supracervical hysterectomy in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.
    Campagna G, Vacca L, Panico G, Rumolo V, Caramazza D, Lombisani A, Rossitto C, Gadonneix P, Scambia G, Ercoli A.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):359-368. PubMed ID: 34132865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Sacrocolpopexy after sub-total hysterectomy vs. sacral hysteropexy for advanced urogenital prolapse: A propensity-matched study.
    Arcieri M, Morlacco A, Montebelli F, Mancini M, Soligo M, Restaino S, Driul L, Campagna G, Panico G, Ercoli A, Scambia G, Dal Moro F, Vizzielli G.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Dec; 163(3):847-853. PubMed ID: 37382353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Pan K, Cao L, Ryan NA, Wang Y, Xu H.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 26179552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison between laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy and subtotal hysterectomy plus cervicopexy in pelvic organ prolapse: A pilot study.
    Gracia M, Perelló M, Bataller E, Espuña M, Parellada M, Genís D, Balasch J, Carmona F.
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2015 Sep; 34(7):654-8. PubMed ID: 24975722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Does hysterectomy modifies the anatomical and functional outcomes of prolapse surgery?: Clinical Practice Guidelines].
    Cayrac M, Warembourg S, Le Normand L, Fatton B.
    Prog Urol; 2016 Jul; 26 Suppl 1():S73-88. PubMed ID: 27595628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R, Chill HH, Levin G, Reuveni-Salzman A, Shveiky D.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Long-Term Outcomes After Vaginal and Laparoscopic Mesh Hysteropexy for Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Parallel Cohort Study (eVAULT).
    Fitzgerald JJ, Sokol ER, Rardin CR, Cundiff GW, Paraiso MFR, Chou J, Gutman RE.
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jun 01; 28(6):e215-e221. PubMed ID: 35536663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of patient reported outcomes, pelvic floor function and recurrence after laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with McCall suspension for advanced uterine prolapse.
    Şükür YE, Dökmeci F, Çetinkaya ŞE, Seval MM.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Apr 01; 247():127-131. PubMed ID: 32092668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of Different Laparoscopic Sacropexy Procedures for Advanced Uterine Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis.
    Yan L, Lu S, Zhao C, Lei L, Liu L.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Apr 01; 30(4):300-307. PubMed ID: 36563872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The effect of hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy on the outcome of laparoscopic uterosacral suspension in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
    Mao M, Fu H, Wang Q, Bai J, Zhang Y, Guo R.
    Maturitas; 2023 Apr 01; 170():58-63. PubMed ID: 36773501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Laparoscopic minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy or hysteropexy and transobturator tape combined with native tissue repair of the vaginal compartments in patients with advanced pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence.
    Ignjatovic I, Potic M, Basic D, Dinic L, Skakic A.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Apr 01; 32(4):967-974. PubMed ID: 32897460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A new approach to supracervical hysterectomy during laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: A randomized clinical trial.
    Campagna G, Morciano A, Rossitto C, Panico G, Naldini A, Ercoli A, Cervigni M, Scambia G.
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Mar 01; 36(3):798-802. PubMed ID: 27128776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol).
    van IJsselmuiden MN, Coolen AL, Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Bongers M, van de Pol G, Vollebregt A, Radder CM, Deprest J, van Eijndhoven HW.
    BMC Womens Health; 2014 Sep 17; 14():112. PubMed ID: 25231240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and sacral colpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse with percutaneous surgical system: Results from a pilot study.
    Campagna G, Panico G, Morciano A, Vacca L, Anchora LP, Gallucci V, Cervigni M, Ercoli A, Scambia G.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Feb 17; 221():160-165. PubMed ID: 29310041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Success rates and outcomes of laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy.
    Daniels S, Robson D, Palacz M, Howell S, Nguyen T, Behnia-Willison F.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr 17; 60(2):244-249. PubMed ID: 31840811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.