These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
145 related items for PubMed ID: 34147571
1. Micronucleus assays with the human derived liver cell line (Huh6): A promising approach to reduce the use of laboratory animals in genetic toxicology. Mišík M, Nersesyan A, Kment M, Ernst B, Setayesh T, Ferk F, Holzmann K, Krupitza G, Knasmueller S. Food Chem Toxicol; 2021 Aug; 154():112355. PubMed ID: 34147571 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cytome micronucleus assays with a metabolically competent human derived liver cell line (Huh6): A promising approach for routine testing of chemicals? Mišík M, Nersesyan A, Bolognesi C, Kundi M, Ferk F, Knasmueller S. Environ Mol Mutagen; 2019 Mar; 60(2):134-144. PubMed ID: 30408237 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of the in vitro rat hepatocyte micronucleus assay in genetic toxicology testing. Müller-Tegethoff K, Kersten B, Kasper P, Müller L. Mutat Res; 1997 Aug 01; 392(1-2):125-38. PubMed ID: 9269337 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity. Kirkland D, Aardema M, Henderson L, Müller L. Mutat Res; 2005 Jul 04; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of comet and micronucleus assays in metabolic competent HepaRG cells to predict in vivo genotoxicity. Le Hégarat L, Mourot A, Huet S, Vasseur L, Camus S, Chesné C, Fessard V. Toxicol Sci; 2014 Apr 04; 138(2):300-9. PubMed ID: 24431211 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro mutagenicity and genotoxicity study of a number of short-chain chlorinated hydrocarbons using the micronucleus test and the alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis technique (Comet assay) in human lymphocytes: a structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis of the genotoxic and cytotoxic potential. Tafazoli M, Baeten A, Geerlings P, Kirsch-Volders M. Mutagenesis; 1998 Mar 04; 13(2):115-26. PubMed ID: 9568582 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of HuH6 and other human-derived hepatoma lines for the detection of genotoxins: a new hope for laboratory animals? Waldherr M, Mišík M, Ferk F, Tomc J, Žegura B, Filipič M, Mikulits W, Mai S, Haas O, Huber WW, Haslinger E, Knasmüller S. Arch Toxicol; 2018 Feb 04; 92(2):921-934. PubMed ID: 29218508 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Automation of the in vitro micronucleus and chromosome aberration assay for the assessment of the genotoxicity of the particulate and gas-vapor phase of cigarette smoke. Roemer E, Zenzen V, Conroy LL, Luedemann K, Dempsey R, Schunck C, Sticken ET. Toxicol Mech Methods; 2015 Feb 04; 25(4):320-33. PubMed ID: 25986082 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Search for the optimal genotoxicity assay for routine testing of chemicals: Sensitivity and specificity of conventional and new test systems. Mišík M, Nersesyan A, Ferk F, Holzmann K, Krupitza G, Herrera Morales D, Staudinger M, Wultsch G, Knasmueller S. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2022 Sep 04; 881():503524. PubMed ID: 36031336 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fluorescence-based recombination assay for sensitive and specific detection of genotoxic carcinogens in human cells. Ireno IC, Baumann C, Stöber R, Hengstler JG, Wiesmüller L. Arch Toxicol; 2014 May 04; 88(5):1141-59. PubMed ID: 24671466 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. High-throughput micronucleus assay using three-dimensional HepaRG spheroids for in vitro genotoxicity testing. Seo JE, Li X, Le Y, Mei N, Zhou T, Guo X. Arch Toxicol; 2023 Apr 04; 97(4):1163-1175. PubMed ID: 36847820 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the Vitotox and RadarScreen assays for the rapid assessment of genotoxicity in the early research phase of drug development. Westerink WM, Stevenson JC, Lauwers A, Griffioen G, Horbach GJ, Schoonen WG. Mutat Res; 2009 May 31; 676(1-2):113-30. PubMed ID: 19393335 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reduction of misleading ("false") positive results in mammalian cell genotoxicity assays. I. Choice of cell type. Fowler P, Smith K, Young J, Jeffrey L, Kirkland D, Pfuhler S, Carmichael P. Mutat Res; 2012 Feb 18; 742(1-2):11-25. PubMed ID: 22138618 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the genotoxic potential of indirect chemical mutagens in HepaRG cells by the comet and the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assays. Le Hegarat L, Dumont J, Josse R, Huet S, Lanceleur R, Mourot A, Poul JM, Guguen-Guillouzo C, Guillouzo A, Fessard V. Mutagenesis; 2010 Nov 18; 25(6):555-60. PubMed ID: 20675360 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of a 28-day repeated-dose micronucleus test in rat glandular stomach, colon, and liver using gastrointestinal tract-targeted genotoxic-carcinogens and non-carcinogens. Okada E, Fujiishi Y, Narumi K, Kado S, Ohyama W. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2019 Aug 18; 844():62-68. PubMed ID: 31326036 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An adaptation of the human HepaRG cells to the in vitro micronucleus assay. Jossé R, Rogue A, Lorge E, Guillouzo A. Mutagenesis; 2012 May 18; 27(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 22058015 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology: an appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes. Kirkland DJ, Henderson L, Marzin D, Müller L, Parry JM, Speit G, Tweats DJ, Williams GM. Mutat Res; 2005 Dec 30; 588(2):88-105. PubMed ID: 16326131 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]