These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

208 related items for PubMed ID: 34170604

  • 1. A Novel Technique to Align the Intraoral Scans to the Virtual Articulator and Set the Patient-Specific Sagittal Condylar Inclination.
    Yang S, Feng N, Li D, Wu Y, Yue L, Yuan Q.
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 34170604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Setting the sagittal condylar inclination on a virtual articulator by using a facial and intraoral scan of the protrusive interocclusal position: A dental technique.
    Hong SJ, Noh K.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):392-395. PubMed ID: 32220398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. An Indirect Digital Technique to Transfer 3D Printed Casts to a Mechanical Articulator With Individual Sagittal Condylar Inclination Settings Using CBCT and Intraoral Scans.
    Yang S, Dong B, Zhang Q, Li J, Yuan Q, Yue L.
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 31(9):822-827. PubMed ID: 35864801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Setting the Sagittal Condylar Inclination on a Virtual Articulator Using Intraoral Scan of Protrusive Interocclusal Position and Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Hong SJ, Choi Y, Park M, Paek J, Pae A, Kim HS, Kwon KR, Noh K.
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):185-189. PubMed ID: 31919939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of the performance of various virtual articulator mounting procedures: a self-controlled clinical study.
    Lin H, Pan Y, Wei X, Wang Y, Yu H, Cheng H.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):4017-4028. PubMed ID: 37247089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Integrating Facial and Intraoral Scans for Digital Esthetic and Occlusal Design: A Technical Report.
    Sun A, Yang Y, Gao H, Lin WS, Chen L, Tan J.
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Oct; 30(8):729-733. PubMed ID: 34109701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Intraoral scanner-based virtual facebow transferring: A chairside dental technique.
    Yang S, Wu L, Alabkaa B, Lepidi L, Yue L, Li J.
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jul 10. PubMed ID: 38985098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of the accuracy of a fully digital method of measuring sagittal condylar inclination.
    Zhou Z, Wang S, Yuan Q, Yue L, Yang S.
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2024 Feb 01; 42(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 38475953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Virtual facebow technique.
    Solaberrieta E, Garmendia A, Minguez R, Brizuela A, Pradies G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Dec 01; 114(6):751-5. PubMed ID: 26372628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Semi-adjustable articulator for computer aided design of complete denture].
    Sun YC, L V PJ, Wang Y.
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2008 Feb 18; 40(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 18278149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Virtual Articulators and Virtual Mounting Procedures: Where Do We Stand?
    Lepidi L, Galli M, Mastrangelo F, Venezia P, Joda T, Wang HL, Li J.
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Jan 18; 30(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 32827222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A comparison of virtually mounted dental casts from traditional facebow records, average values, and 3D facial scans.
    Inoue N, Scialabba R, Lee JD, Lee SJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan 18; 131(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 35382941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from a clinical method and with cone beam computed tomography in dentate individuals.
    Das A, Muddugangadhar BC, Mawani DP, Mukhopadhyay A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May 18; 125(5):753-757. PubMed ID: 32423552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of the accuracy of a 3-dimensional virtual method and the conventional method for transferring the maxillary cast to a virtual articulator.
    Solaberrieta E, Mínguez R, Barrenetxea L, Otegi JR, Szentpétery A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar 18; 113(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 25557006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Virtual facebow technique using standardized background images.
    Petre A, Drafta S, Stefanescu C, Oancea L.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May 18; 121(5):724-728. PubMed ID: 30580985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Additively manufactured scan body for transferring a virtual 3-dimensional representation to a digital articulator for completely edentulous patients.
    Pérez-Giugovaz MG, Mostafavi D, Revilla-León M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec 18; 128(6):1171-1178. PubMed ID: 33934845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Selecting a Virtual Articulator: An Analysis of the Factors Available with Mechanical Articulators and their Potential Need for Inclusion with Virtual Articulators.
    Goldstein G, Goodacre C.
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jan 18; 32(1):10-17. PubMed ID: 35344633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant.
    Nazir N, Sujesh M, Kumar R, Sreenivas P.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012 Jan 18; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. An overview of the different digital facebow methods for transferring the maxillary cast into the virtual articulator.
    Revilla-León M, Zeitler JM, Kois JC.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Dec 18; 36(12):1675-1686. PubMed ID: 38778662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Registering Maxillomandibular Relation to Create a Virtual Patient Integrated with a Virtual Articulator for Complex Implant Rehabilitation: A Clinical Report.
    Li J, Chen Z, Dong B, Wang HL, Joda T, Yu H.
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Aug 18; 29(7):553-557. PubMed ID: 32424940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.