These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

167 related items for PubMed ID: 3419824

  • 21. [Comparison of the threshold interpolation and whole-line method on logMAR chart and Snellen chart for visual acuity testing].
    Veselý P, Ventruba J.
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2009 Oct; 65(5):191-4. PubMed ID: 20052823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Using the KM visual acuity chart for more reliable evaluation of amblyopia compared to the HVOT method.
    Moutakis K, Stigmar G, Hall-Lindberg J.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Oct; 82(5):547-51. PubMed ID: 15453851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Comparison of near visual acuity and reading metrics in presbyopia correction.
    Gupta N, Wolffsohn JS, Naroo SA.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Aug; 35(8):1401-9. PubMed ID: 19631128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Visual acuity with spherical and toric soft contact lenses in low- to moderate-astigmatic eyes.
    Richdale K, Berntsen DA, Mack CJ, Merchea MM, Barr JT.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 84(10):969-75. PubMed ID: 18049362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Evaluating a new logMAR chart designed to improve visual acuity assessment in population-based surveys.
    Bourne RR, Rosser DA, Sukudom P, Dineen B, Laidlaw DA, Johnson GJ, Murdoch IE.
    Eye (Lond); 2003 Aug; 17(6):754-8. PubMed ID: 12928690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Validation of a computerised logMAR visual acuity measurement system (COMPlog): comparison with ETDRS and the electronic ETDRS testing algorithm in adults and amblyopic children.
    Laidlaw DA, Tailor V, Shah N, Atamian S, Harcourt C.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 92(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 17993577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Vanishing Optotype acuity: repeatability and effect of the number of alternatives.
    Shah N, Dakin SC, Redmond T, Anderson RS.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2011 Jan; 31(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 21158882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Visual mechanisms of recognition of vanishing figures].
    Koskin SA, Boĭko EV, Sobolev AF, Shelepin IuE.
    Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 2005 Sep; 91(9):1080-90. PubMed ID: 16353483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Visual acuity and "balanced progressive" simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
    Sanders E, Wagner H, Reich LN.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2008 Sep; 34(5):293-6. PubMed ID: 18779670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.