These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

114 related items for PubMed ID: 3420254

  • 1. Contrast medium-induced adverse reactions: economic outcome.
    Powe NR, Steinberg EP, Erickson JE, Moore RD, Smith CR, White RI, Brinker JA, Fishman EK, Zinreich SJ, Kinnison ML.
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):163-8. PubMed ID: 3420254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Frequency and determinants of adverse reactions induced by high-osmolality contrast media.
    Moore RD, Steinberg EP, Powe NR, White RI, Brinker JA, Fishman EK, Zinreich SJ, Smith CR.
    Radiology; 1989 Mar; 170(3 Pt 1):727-32. PubMed ID: 2916027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Adverse reactions to contrast media: factors that determine the cost of treatment.
    Powe NR, Moore RD, Steinberg EP.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Nov; 161(5):1089-95. PubMed ID: 8273616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Low-osmolality contrast media: good news or bad?
    Evens RG.
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):277-8. PubMed ID: 3138706
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Selective use of low-osmolality contrast agents for i.v. urography and CT: safety and effect on cost.
    Hunter TB, Dye J, Duval JF.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):965-8. PubMed ID: 8092044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The cost-effectiveness of replacing high-osmolality with low-osmolality contrast media.
    Caro JJ, Trindade E, McGregor M.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Oct; 159(4):869-74. PubMed ID: 1529856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Net costs from three perspectives of using low versus high osmolality contrast medium in diagnostic angiocardiography.
    Powe NR, Davidoff AJ, Moore RD, Brinker JA, Anderson GF, Litt MR, Gopalan R, Graziano SL, Steinberg EP.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Jun; 21(7):1701-9. PubMed ID: 8496540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Safety and cost effectiveness of high-osmolality as compared with low-osmolality contrast material in patients undergoing cardiac angiography.
    Steinberg EP, Moore RD, Powe NR, Gopalan R, Davidoff AJ, Litt M, Graziano S, Brinker JA.
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Feb 13; 326(7):425-30. PubMed ID: 1732769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The safety and cost-effectiveness of low osmolar contrast media. Can economic analysis determine the real worth of a new technology?
    Henry DA, Evans DB, Robertson J.
    Med J Aust; 1991 Jun 03; 154(11):766-72. PubMed ID: 1828529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Economic impact of low-osmolality contrast agents on radiology procedures and departments.
    Evens RG.
    Radiology; 1987 Jan 03; 162(1 Pt 1):267-8. PubMed ID: 3786775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Miscellaneous adverse effects of low-versus high-osmolality contrast media: a study revised.
    Brismar J, Jacobsson BF, Jorulf H.
    Radiology; 1991 Apr 03; 179(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 1826061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.