These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

206 related items for PubMed ID: 3421135

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Simulation of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials.
    Nandedkar SD, Sanders DB, Stålberg EV, Andreassen S.
    Muscle Nerve; 1988 Feb; 11(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 3343991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Simulation of myopathic motor unit action potentials.
    Nandedkar SD, Sanders DB.
    Muscle Nerve; 1989 Mar; 12(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 2725550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of intramuscular needle position on motor unit action potential metrics.
    Brownell AA, Bromberg MB.
    Muscle Nerve; 2007 Apr; 35(4):465-70. PubMed ID: 17221877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. On the selection of concentric needle electromyogram motor unit action potentials: is the rise time criterion too restrictive?
    Barkhaus PE, Nandedkar SD.
    Muscle Nerve; 1996 Dec; 19(12):1554-60. PubMed ID: 8941269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Principal component analysis of the features of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials.
    Nandedkar SD, Sanders DB.
    Muscle Nerve; 1989 Apr; 12(4):288-93. PubMed ID: 2770781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Recording characteristics of monopolar EMG electrodes.
    Nandedkar SD, Sanders DB.
    Muscle Nerve; 1991 Feb; 14(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 2000101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Antigravity posture for analysis of motor unit recruitment: the "45 degree test".
    Petajan JH.
    Muscle Nerve; 1990 Apr; 13(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 2355948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Simulation and analysis of the electromyographic interference pattern in normal muscle. Part II: Activity, upper centile amplitude, and number of small segments.
    Nandedkar SD, Sanders DB, Stålberg EV.
    Muscle Nerve; 1986 Apr; 9(6):486-90. PubMed ID: 3736582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Concentric-ring electrode systems for noninvasive detection of single motor unit activity.
    Farina D, Cescon C.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Nov; 48(11):1326-34. PubMed ID: 11686631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A new method for the extraction and classification of single motor unit action potentials from surface EMG signals.
    Gazzoni M, Farina D, Merletti R.
    J Neurosci Methods; 2004 Jul 30; 136(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 15183268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Motor unit action potential topography and its use in motor unit number estimation.
    Blok JH, Van Dijk JP, Zwarts MJ, Stegeman DF.
    Muscle Nerve; 2005 Sep 30; 32(3):280-91. PubMed ID: 15937880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Quantification of motor unit action potential energy.
    Sheean GL.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Mar 30; 123(3):621-5. PubMed ID: 21903464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.