These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


152 related items for PubMed ID: 3422729

  • 1. A clinical comparison of xeroradiography and film radiography for the detection of proximal caries.
    White SC, Gratt BM, Bauer JG.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Feb; 65(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 3422729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of xeroradiographs and two types of film for detecting caries in approximal surfaces of primary teeth.
    White SC, McMullin K.
    Caries Res; 1986 Feb; 20(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 3463427
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Detection of occlusal caries without cavitation by visual inspection, film radiographs, xeroradiographs, and digitized radiographs.
    Wenzel A, Larsen MJ, Fejerskov O.
    Caries Res; 1991 Feb; 25(5):365-71. PubMed ID: 1747887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of xeroradiographs and film for detection of proximal surface caries.
    White SC, Hollender L, Gratt BM.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1984 May; 108(5):755-9. PubMed ID: 6588117
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A subjective study of dental diagnostic utility comparing xeroradiography and film radiography.
    Gratt BM, White SC, Sickles EA.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Nov; 68(5):653-60. PubMed ID: 2812719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. In vitro carious lesion detection on D-, E-, and F-speed radiographic films.
    Schulze RK, Nackat D, D'hoedt B.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Apr; 97(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 15088040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Xeroradiography for imaging biomaterials--A comparison with conventional radiography.
    Gratt BM, Sickles EA, Lacy AM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Nov; 44(5):567-72. PubMed ID: 6934294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Alkurt MT, Peker I, Bala O, Altunkaynak B.
    Oper Dent; 2007 Nov; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A film and cassette holder for simultaneous xeroradiography and conventional radiography in longitudinal studies.
    Griffiths GS, Coulthurst SK, Gillett IR, Johnson NW.
    Br Dent J; 1988 Jun 11; 164(11):365-7. PubMed ID: 3165014
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Caries detection with xeroradiographs: the influence of observer experience.
    White SC.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jul 11; 64(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 3475648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.