These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

152 related items for PubMed ID: 3422729

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Radiographic quality control measurements comparing D-speed film, E-speed film, and xeroradiography.
    Diehl R, Gratt BM, Gould RG.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):635-40. PubMed ID: 3459995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Detection of proximal carious lesions: two-film versus four-film bitewing radiography.
    Kaffe I, Gordon M, Laufer B, Littner MM.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 May; 57(5):567-71. PubMed ID: 6587305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Exposure times at which dental xeroradiographs and radiographs have comparable optical density.
    Alexander JB, Andrews JD.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Sep; 66(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 3174071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Radiovisiographic diagnosis of dental caries: initial comparison of basic mode videoprints with bitewing radiography.
    Russell M, Pitts NB.
    Caries Res; 1993 Sep; 27(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 8448777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Developments in radiographic caries diagnosis.
    Wenzel A, Pitts N, Verdonschot EH, Kalsbeek H.
    J Dent; 1993 Jun; 21(3):131-40. PubMed ID: 8315086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Interproximal caries detection: how good are we?
    Dykstra B.
    Dent Today; 2008 Apr; 27(4):144, 146-7. PubMed ID: 18497209
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Exposure reduction of 96% in intraoral radiography.
    Kircos LT, Vandre RH, Lorton L.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1986 Nov; 113(5):746-50. PubMed ID: 3465788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Proximal surface caries detection with direct-exposure and rare earth screen/film imaging.
    Lundeen RC, McDavid WD, Barnwell GM.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Dec; 66(6):734-45. PubMed ID: 3205558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Reliability of digital radiography of interproximal dental caries.
    Sanden E, Koob A, Hassfeld S, Staehle HJ, Eickholz P.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 12967070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Effects of beam collimation on image quality.
    Peterson CA, Mauriello SM, Overman VP, Platin E, Tangen CM.
    J Dent Hyg; 1997 Jun; 71(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 9470560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Evaluation of the diagnostic advantage of intraoral D and E film for detecting interproximal caries.
    Ardakani FE, Davari A, Goodarzipour D, Goodarzipour K, Fallahzadeh H.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Nov 15; 5(4):58-70. PubMed ID: 15558091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Accuracy of proximal caries depth determination using two intraoral film speeds.
    Jessee SA, Makins SR, Bretz WA.
    Gen Dent; 1999 Nov 15; 47(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 10321157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.