These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

268 related items for PubMed ID: 342330

  • 21. The choice of suture materials and techniques for repair of perineal trauma: an overview of the evidence from controlled trials.
    Grant A.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Nov; 96(11):1281-9. PubMed ID: 2558706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. A comparison between catgut and polyglycolic acid sutures in episiotomy repair.
    Livingstone E, Simpson D, Naismith WC.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw; 1974 Mar; 81(3):245-7. PubMed ID: 4595298
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Continuous versus interrupted episiotomy repair with monofilament or multifilament absorbed suture materials: a randomised controlled trial.
    Kokanalı D, Ugur M, Kuntay Kokanalı M, Karayalcın R, Tonguc E.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 20680312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. [Intradermal suturing compared with interrupted sutures in episiotomy].
    Detlefsen GU, Vinther S, Larsen P, Schroeder E.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1980 Nov 17; 142(47):3117-20. PubMed ID: 6255654
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears.
    Kettle C, Dowswell T, Ismail KM.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Jun 16; 2010(6):CD000006. PubMed ID: 20556745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Further studies with polyglycolic acid (Dexon) and other sutures in infected experimental wounds.
    Varma S, Lumb WV, Johnson LW, Ferguson HL.
    Am J Vet Res; 1981 Apr 16; 42(4):571-4. PubMed ID: 6277212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Randomized comparison of chromic versus fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 for postpartum perineal repair.
    Dandolu V, Chatwani A.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov 16; 104(5 Pt 1):1104-5; author reply 1105. PubMed ID: 15516412
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. A prospective randomized comparative study of vicryl rapide versus chromic catgut for episiotomy repair.
    Bharathi A, Reddy DB, Kote GS.
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2013 Feb 16; 7(2):326-30. PubMed ID: 23543639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Suturing after childbirth--a randomised controlled study testing a new monofilament material.
    Dencker A, Lundgren I, Sporrong T.
    BJOG; 2006 Jan 16; 113(1):114-6. PubMed ID: 16398780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [The effect of various suture materials on wound healing. An experimental study in animals (author's transl)].
    Brückner WL, Löweneck H.
    MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1979 Sep 28; 121(39):1255-7. PubMed ID: 114802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Absorbable synthetic versus catgut suture material for perineal repair.
    Kettle C, Johanson RB.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000 Sep 28; (2):CD000006. PubMed ID: 10796081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Natural history of vertical abdominal parietal closure: Prolene versus Dexon.
    Lewis RT, Wiegand FM.
    Can J Surg; 1989 May 28; 32(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 2540896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Episiotomy repair: Vicryl versus Vicryl rapide.
    McElhinney BR, Glenn DR, Dornan G, Harper MA.
    Ulster Med J; 2000 May 28; 69(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 10881642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.