These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

145 related items for PubMed ID: 34256006

  • 1. Effect of Hearing Aid Technology Level and Individual Characteristics on Listener Outcome Measures.
    Plyler PN, Hausladen J, Capps M, Cox MA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Aug 09; 64(8):3317-3329. PubMed ID: 34256006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of Hearing Aid Technology Level on New Hearing Aid Users.
    Hausladen J, Plyler PN, Clausen B, Fincher A, Norris S, Russell T.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Mar 09; 33(3):149-157. PubMed ID: 34670289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The relationship between the acceptance of noise and acoustic environments in young adults with normal hearing: a pilot study.
    Franklin CA, White LJ, Franklin TC, Smith-Olinde L.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Jun 09; 25(6):584-91. PubMed ID: 25313548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effect of presentation level on normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' acceptable speech and noise levels.
    Recker KL, Edwards BW.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan 09; 24(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 23231813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Efficacy and Effectiveness of Advanced Hearing Aid Directional and Noise Reduction Technologies for Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Wu YH, Stangl E, Chipara O, Hasan SS, DeVries S, Oleson J.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Jan 09; 40(4):805-822. PubMed ID: 30379683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life II: Speech Understanding and Listening Effort.
    Johnson JA, Xu J, Cox RM.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Jan 09; 37(5):529-40. PubMed ID: 27556363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J, Marrone N, Muller T.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Jan 09; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The Effects of Extended Input Dynamic Range on Laboratory and Field-Trial Evaluations in Adult Hearing Aid Users.
    Plyler PN, Easterday M, Behrens T.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan 09; 30(7):634-648. PubMed ID: 30403956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effects of noise reduction technologies on the acceptance of background noise.
    Lowery KJ, Plyler PN.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep 09; 24(8):649-59. PubMed ID: 24131601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of speech perception in background noise with acceptance of background noise in aided and unaided conditions.
    Nabelek AK, Tampas JW, Burchfield SB.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Oct 09; 47(5):1001-11. PubMed ID: 15603458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
    Wolfe J, Duke M, Schafer E, Jones C, Rakita L.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May 09; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical Performance Evaluation of a Personal Sound Amplification Product vs a Basic Hearing Aid and a Premium Hearing Aid.
    Cho YS, Park SY, Seol HY, Lim JH, Cho YS, Hong SH, Moon IJ.
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Jun 01; 145(6):516-522. PubMed ID: 31095263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH, Stangl E, Bentler RA, Stanziola RW.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun 01; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Benefit on daily listening with technological advancements: comparison of basic and premium category hearing aids.
    Prakash P, Sreedhar A, Balan JR, Varghese AM.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jun 01; 279(6):3179-3187. PubMed ID: 35038028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life I: The Patients' Perspective.
    Cox RM, Johnson JA, Xu J.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Jun 01; 37(4):e224-37. PubMed ID: 26881981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Predicting Individual Hearing-Aid Preference From Self-Reported Listening Experiences in Daily Life.
    Christensen JH, Rumley J, Gil-Carvajal JC, Whiston H, Lough M, Saunders GH.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Jun 01; 45(5):1313-1325. PubMed ID: 38783420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Speech Recognition at the Acceptable Noise Level.
    Gordon-Hickey S, Morlas H.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May 01; 26(5):443-450. PubMed ID: 26055834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.