These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

314 related items for PubMed ID: 3427241

  • 21. Cruelty to the mentally ill: an Eighth Amendment challenge to the abolition of the insanity defense.
    LeBlanc SM.
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Jun; 56(5):1281-328. PubMed ID: 17632959
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Morality, equality, and expertise: renegotiating the relationship between psychiatry and the criminal law.
    Bonnie RJ.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984 Jun; 12(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 6713103
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Clark v. Arizona: diminishing the right of mentally ill individuals to a full and fair defense.
    Wortzel H, Metzner J.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2006 Jun; 34(4):545-8. PubMed ID: 17185487
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Psychiatric justice.
    Szasz T.
    Br J Psychiatry; 1989 Jun; 154():864-9. PubMed ID: 2597895
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Introduction to this issue: diversion from the criminal justice system.
    Petrila J.
    Behav Sci Law; 2005 Jun; 23(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 15818602
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Ethical issues in forensic psychiatry: from an attorney's perspective.
    Weiner BA.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984 Jun; 12(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 6478068
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. A legal perspective on dangerousness: current status.
    Dix GE.
    Psychiatr Ann; 1983 Mar; 13(3):243, 247+. PubMed ID: 11649612
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication?
    Dlugacz HA.
    Law Psychol Rev; 1993 Mar; 17():41-83. PubMed ID: 11659926
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Donaldson revisited: is dangerousness a constitutional requirement for civil commitment?
    Linburn GE.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998 Mar; 26(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 9785278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Supreme Court ruling says criminal standard of proof unnecessary for commitment.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1979 Aug; 30(8):573, 577, 581. PubMed ID: 457053
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.