These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

389 related items for PubMed ID: 3428845

  • 41. Hemodynamic performance of the Ionescu-Shiley valve prosthesis.
    Becker RM, Strom J, Frishman W, Oka Y, Lin YT, Yellin EL, Frater RW.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Oct; 80(4):613-20. PubMed ID: 7421295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Comparison of the closing dynamics of mechanical prosthetic heart valves.
    Naemura K, Ohta Y, Fujimoto T, Umezu M, Matsumoto H, Dohi T.
    ASAIO J; 1997 Oct; 43(5):M401-4. PubMed ID: 9360070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. [Intracardiac flow dynamic alterations with a prosthetic mitral valve studied by pulsed Doppler technique].
    Kitabatake A, Tanouchi J, Asao M, Mishima M, Ishihara K, Masuyama T, Inoue M, Abe H, Matsuo H, Morita H.
    J Cardiogr; 1985 Jun; 15(2):469-82. PubMed ID: 4093627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Björk-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards valves. A comparative analysis.
    Nashef SA, Sethia B, Turner MA, Davidson KG, Lewis S, Bain WH.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Mar; 93(3):394-404. PubMed ID: 3821149
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Doppler hemodynamic evaluation of prosthetic (Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley) and bioprosthetic (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) cardiac valves.
    Williams GA, Labovitz AJ.
    Am J Cardiol; 1985 Aug 01; 56(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 4025173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Central hemodynamics at rest and during exercise after mitral valve replacement with different prostheses.
    Horstkotte D, Haerten K, Seipel L, Körfer R, Budde T, Bircks W, Loogen F.
    Circulation; 1983 Sep 01; 68(3 Pt 2):II161-8. PubMed ID: 6872188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Development of mechanical heart valves: past, present and future.
    Björk VO.
    Can J Cardiol; 1989 Sep 01; 5(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 2645983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. The new St. Jude Medical regent mechanical heart valve: laboratory measurements of hydrodynamic performance.
    Walker DK, Brendzel AM, Scotten LN.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov 01; 8(6):687-96. PubMed ID: 10616249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. [Continuous wave Doppler assessment of prosthetic valves in the mitral position: comparison of the St. Jude medical mechanical valve and the porcine xenograft valve].
    Kisanuki A, Tei C, Arikawa K, Natsugoe K, Otsuji Y, Kawazoe Y, Tanaka H, Morishita Y, Maruko M, Taira A.
    J Cardiogr; 1985 Dec 01; 15(4):1119-27. PubMed ID: 3841894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.