These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Robustness of an adaptive beamforming method for hearing aids. Peterson PM, Wei SM, Rabinowitz WM, Zurek PM. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():85-90. PubMed ID: 2356741 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of an adaptive noise canceler as an input preprocessor for a hearing aid. Weiss M. J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):93-102. PubMed ID: 3430394 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of two-microphone noise reduction on speech recognition by normal-hearing listeners. Schwander T, Levitt H. J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):87-92. PubMed ID: 3430393 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System. Spriet A, Van Deun L, Eftaxiadis K, Laneau J, Moonen M, van Dijk B, van Wieringen A, Wouters J. Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 17204899 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test. Cameron S, Dillon H, Newall P. Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit. Ricketts TA, Hornsby BW. Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):472-84. PubMed ID: 14663347 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Noise reduction in binaural hearing aids: analyzing the benefit over monaural systems. Srinivasan S. J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):EL353-9. PubMed ID: 19206693 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Manikin and cochlear implant patient test results with a portable adaptive beamforming processor to suppress the effects of noise. van Hoesel RJ, Clark GM. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():144-6. PubMed ID: 7668608 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Better speech perception in noise with an assistive multimicrophone array for hearing AIDS. Luts H, Maj JB, Soede W, Wouters J. Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):411-20. PubMed ID: 15599189 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Binaural noise-reduction hearing aid scheme with real-time processing in the frequency domain. Kollmeier B, Peissig J, Hohmann V. Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Oct; 38():28-38. PubMed ID: 8153562 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and assessment of two fixed-array microphones for use with hearing aids. Bilsen FA, Soede W, Berkhout AJ. J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993 Oct; 30(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 8263830 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Multicenter evaluation of signal enhancement algorithms for hearing aids. Luts H, Eneman K, Wouters J, Schulte M, Vormann M, Buechler M, Dillier N, Houben R, Dreschler WA, Froehlich M, Puder H, Grimm G, Hohmann V, Leijon A, Lombard A, Mauler D, Spriet A. J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1491-505. PubMed ID: 20329849 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of an adaptive beamforming method for hearing aids. Greenberg JE, Zurek PM. J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Mar; 91(3):1662-76. PubMed ID: 1564202 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of adaptive digital signal processing to speech enhancement for the hearing impaired. Chabries DM, Christiansen RW, Brey RH, Robinette MS, Harris RW. J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987 Mar; 24(4):65-74. PubMed ID: 3430391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants. Fitzpatrick EM, Séguin C, Schramm DR, Armstrong S, Chénier J. Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]