These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

303 related items for PubMed ID: 3430392

  • 1. Improvement in speech intelligibility in noise employing an adaptive filter with normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Brey RH, Robinette MS, Chabries DM, Christiansen RW.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):75-86. PubMed ID: 3430392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Application of adaptive digital signal processing to speech enhancement for the hearing impaired.
    Chabries DM, Christiansen RW, Brey RH, Robinette MS, Harris RW.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):65-74. PubMed ID: 3430391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A single-microphone-based self-adaptive filter of noise from speech and its performance evaluation.
    Graupe D, Grosspietsch JK, Basseas SP.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):119-26. PubMed ID: 3430371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effect of filtering on the intelligibility and quality of speech in noise.
    Neuman AC, Schwander TJ.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):127-34. PubMed ID: 3430372
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
    Kollmeier B, Peissig J, Hohmann V.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Binaural noise-reduction hearing aid scheme with real-time processing in the frequency domain.
    Kollmeier B, Peissig J, Hohmann V.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():28-38. PubMed ID: 8153562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Speech discrimination with an 8-channel compression hearing aid and conventional aids in background of speech-band noise.
    Yund EW, Simon HJ, Efron R.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):161-80. PubMed ID: 3430375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of two-microphone noise reduction on speech recognition by normal-hearing listeners.
    Schwander T, Levitt H.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):87-92. PubMed ID: 3430393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Spectral enhancement to improve the intelligibility of speech in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Simpson AM, Moore BC, Glasberg BR.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():101-7. PubMed ID: 2356717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Multimicrophone adaptive beamforming for interference reduction in hearing aids.
    Peterson PM, Durlach NI, Rabinowitz WM, Zurek PM.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):103-10. PubMed ID: 3430369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Use of an adaptive noise canceler as an input preprocessor for a hearing aid.
    Weiss M.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):93-102. PubMed ID: 3430394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Development and assessment of two fixed-array microphones for use with hearing aids.
    Bilsen FA, Soede W, Berkhout AJ.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 8263830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Considerations on adaptive gain and frequency response in hearing aids.
    Festen JM, van Dijkhuizen JN, Plomp R.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():196-201. PubMed ID: 2356727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Understanding compression: modeling the effects of dynamic-range compression in hearing aids.
    Kates JM.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):395-409. PubMed ID: 20225931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Multicenter evaluation of signal enhancement algorithms for hearing aids.
    Luts H, Eneman K, Wouters J, Schulte M, Vormann M, Buechler M, Dillier N, Houben R, Dreschler WA, Froehlich M, Puder H, Grimm G, Hohmann V, Leijon A, Lombard A, Mauler D, Spriet A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1491-505. PubMed ID: 20329849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A psychophysical evaluation of spectral enhancement.
    DiGiovanni JJ, Nelson PB, Schlauch RS.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1121-35. PubMed ID: 16411801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH, Bentler RA.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Oct; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Signal processing for hearing impairment.
    Levitt H, Bakke M, Kates J, Neuman A, Schwander T, Weiss M.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Oct; 38():7-19. PubMed ID: 8153567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Auditory filtering and the discrimination of spectral shapes by normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Turner CW, Holte LA, Relkin E.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987 Oct; 24(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 3430382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Speech enhancement by filtering in the loudness domain.
    Kollmeier B.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990 Oct; 469():207-14. PubMed ID: 2356729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.