These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

303 related items for PubMed ID: 3430392

  • 41.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V, Cord MT.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Speech-perception aids for hearing-impaired people: current status and needed research. Working Group on Communication Aids for the Hearing-Impaired.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Aug; 90(2 Pt 1):637-83. PubMed ID: 1939883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. The effects of increasing consonant/vowel intensity ratio on speech loudness.
    Montgomery AA, Prosek RA, Walden BE, Cord MT.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987 May; 24(4):221-8. PubMed ID: 3430381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Speech distortion measures for hearing aids.
    Williamson MJ, Cummins KL, Hecox KE.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987 May; 24(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 3430386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Comparison of two speech processing schemes using normal-hearing subjects.
    Tong YC, Harrison JM, Huigen J, Clark GM.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990 May; 469():135-9. PubMed ID: 2141444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Measurement and prediction of the acceptable noise level for single-microphone noise reduction algorithms.
    Fredelake S, Holube I, Schlueter A, Hansen M.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 22316007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.