These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


135 related items for PubMed ID: 3435850

  • 1. Comparison of iohexol and ioxaglate in selective coronary angiography.
    Haagen FD, Lok D, Pasteuning H.
    Can J Cardiol; 1987 Nov; 3 Suppl A():16A-20A. PubMed ID: 3435850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Iohexol and ioxaglate in peripheral angiography.
    Stiris MG, Laerum F.
    Acta Radiol; 1987 Nov; 28(6):767-70. PubMed ID: 2962617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects of low osmolar contrast agents during coronary angiography in the dog and the rabbit.
    Doucet D, Idée JM, Donadieu AM, Bonnemain B.
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989 Nov; 32(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 2742326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Influence of low osmolality contrast media on electrophysiology and hemodynamics in coronary angiography: differences between an ionic (ioxaglate) and a nonionic (iohexol) agent.
    Vik-Mo H, Følling M, Barth P, Nordrehaug JE, Bjørkhaug A, Rosland GA.
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1990 Dec; 21(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 2276191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Sodium addition to nonionic contrast media. Effects on cardiac monophasic action potentials and hemodynamics in a dog model.
    Jacobsen EA, Kløw NE, Mortensen E, Refsum H.
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Oct; 26(10):888-93. PubMed ID: 1960031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Nonionic low-osmolar contrast media have no impact on major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary stenting with appropriate antiplatelet therapy.
    Danzi GB, Capuano C, Sesana M, Predolini S, Baglini R.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Dec; 60(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 14624424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Open label study of ioxaglate in coronary angiography. Multicentre clinical trial.
    Can J Cardiol; 1987 Nov; 3 Suppl A():21A-22A. PubMed ID: 3325156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The effect of the temperature of contrast media on cardiac electrophysiology and hemodynamics during coronary arteriography.
    Jacobsen EA, Mortensen E, Refsum H, Kløw NE.
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Nov; 27(11):942-6. PubMed ID: 1464514
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of contrast media on the RR and QT interval during coronary arteriography.
    Mitsumori M, Hayakawa K, Soga T, Maeda M, Torizuka T, Okuno Y, Misaki T, Dokoh S.
    Acta Radiol; 1991 Mar; 32(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 2031794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Iohexol, ioxaglate and iopamidol in coronary angiography. A double-blind comparative study of 300 patients.
    Soiva M, Hekali P, Keto P, Karumo J, Salonen O, Heikkilä J.
    Australas Radiol; 1991 May; 35(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 1930006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Recent development in non-ionic contrast media.
    Hagen B.
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989 May; 32(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 2742324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of contrast media on myocardial function during acute left ventricular failure in the dog.
    Kløw NE, Hevrøy O, Dale K, Mjøs OD.
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Jan; 25(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 2298549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Adverse reactions of low osmolar non-ionic and ionic contrast media when used together or separately during percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Juergens CP, Khaing AM, McIntyre GJ, Leung DY, Lo ST, Fernandes C, Hopkins AP.
    Heart Lung Circ; 2005 Sep; 14(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 16352273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function during coronary arteriography before and after acute left ventricular failure in dogs. A comparison between iodixanol, iohexol and ioxaglate.
    Kløw NE, Mortensen E, Refsum H.
    Acta Radiol; 1991 Mar; 32(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 2031795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of sodium-meglumine ioxaglate and iopromide in coronary angiography.
    Neiss AC, Barth P, Chastin I, Erdmann E.
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989 Mar; 32(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 2662884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Tolerability of a new non-ionic contrast medium, iopromide in x-ray computed tomography. Comparison with ioxaglate 320 mgI/ml].
    Fredy D, Heitz F, Mathieu D, Vasile N.
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1989 Mar; 32(4 Pt 2):358-60. PubMed ID: 2688533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.