These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

224 related items for PubMed ID: 34358734

  • 1. Multicenter Comparison of the Toronto Portable Perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer: A Pilot Study.
    Ahmed Y, Pereira A, Bowden S, Shi RB, Li Y, Ahmed IIK, Arshinoff SA.
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022; 5(2):146-159. PubMed ID: 34358734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of a Novel Head-Mounted Objective Auto-perimetry (Gaze Analyzing Perimeter) and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Miyake M, Mori Y, Wada S, Yamada K, Shiraishi R, Numa S, Suda K, Kameda T, Ikeda H, Akagi T, Aibara T, Tamura H, Tsujikawa A.
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2024; 7(5):445-453. PubMed ID: 38823680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from a Tablet Perimeter, Smart Visual Function Analyzer, and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Kang J, De Arrigunaga S, Freeman SE, Zhao Y, Lin M, Liebman DL, Roldan AM, Kim JA, Chang DS, Friedman DS, Elze T.
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(5):509-520. PubMed ID: 36918066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of the visual field test of Glaufield Lite with Humphrey Field Analyser.
    Behera G, Waghmare SV, Ramasamy A.
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 43(2):557-565. PubMed ID: 35947251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of Humphrey Field Analyzer and imo visual field test results in patients with glaucoma and pseudo-fixation loss.
    Goukon H, Hirasawa K, Kasahara M, Matsumura K, Shoji N.
    PLoS One; 2019 Feb; 14(11):e0224711. PubMed ID: 31697732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparative Analysis of 10-2 Test on Advanced Vision Analyzer and Humphrey Perimeter in Glaucoma.
    Narang P, Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Narang R, Sundaramoorthy L.
    Ophthalmol Sci; 2023 Jun; 3(2):100264. PubMed ID: 36846107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of the Performance of a Novel, Smartphone-based, Head-mounted Perimeter (GearVision) With the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Pradhan ZS, Sircar T, Agrawal H, Rao HL, Bopardikar A, Devi S, Tiwari VN.
    J Glaucoma; 2021 Apr 01; 30(4):e146-e152. PubMed ID: 33596021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Measuring Visual Fields in Children With Glaucoma Using a Portable Tablet.
    Gupta V, Kong GXY, Singh A, Panigrahi A, Gupta S, Prea S, Vingrys AJ.
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 May 01; 13(5):10. PubMed ID: 38743410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyser and Humphrey Matrix Perimeter for the evaluation of glaucoma patients.
    Chen YH, Wu JN, Chen JT, Lu DW.
    Ophthalmologica; 2008 May 01; 222(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 18781091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The Effect of Testing Reliability on Visual Field Sensitivity in Normal Eyes: The Singapore Chinese Eye Study.
    Tan NYQ, Tham YC, Koh V, Nguyen DQ, Cheung CY, Aung T, Wong TY, Cheng CY.
    Ophthalmology; 2018 Jan 01; 125(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 28863943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.