These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


102 related items for PubMed ID: 3436924

  • 1. Influence of stimulus polarity on far-field auditory-evoked electrical responses in the chick.
    Brown-Borg HM, Beck MM, Jones TA.
    J Aud Res; 1986 Oct; 26(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 3436924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [The influence of click polarity and stimulation rate on the auditory evoked response in relation to age].
    Tarantino V, Stura M, Raspino M, Conrad E, Porcu A.
    Pediatr Med Chir; 1989 Oct; 11(5):523-7. PubMed ID: 2631058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Auditory brain stem responses (ABR) in cat. Latency as a function of stimulus polarity, intensity and acoustic waveform.
    Tvete O, Haugsten P.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1981 Oct; 13():35-8. PubMed ID: 6944776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Brain stem auditory-evoked response of the nonanesthetized dog.
    Marshall AE.
    Am J Vet Res; 1985 Apr; 46(4):966-73. PubMed ID: 4014849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Brainstem response (ABR) to rarefaction and condensation clicks in normal hearing and steep high-frequency hearing loss.
    Borg E, Löfqvist L.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1981 Apr; 13():99-101. PubMed ID: 6944785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Auditory-evoked response in the clinically normal dog: early latency components.
    Sims MH, Moore RE.
    Am J Vet Res; 1984 Oct; 45(10):2019-27. PubMed ID: 6497099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). I: Effects of click level, rate, and polarity.
    Burkard R, Voigt HF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2514-25. PubMed ID: 2745876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Brain stem auditory evoked potentials from bone stimulation in dogs.
    Strain GM, Green KD, Twedt AC, Tedford BL.
    Am J Vet Res; 1993 Nov; 54(11):1817-21. PubMed ID: 8291757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Middle latency auditory evoked responses in normal term infants: a longitudinal study.
    Rogers SH, Edwards DA, Henderson-Smart DJ, Pettigrew AG.
    Neuropediatrics; 1989 May; 20(2):59-63. PubMed ID: 2739875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in the fetal sheep, in utero.
    Cook CJ, Williams C, Gluckman PD.
    J Dev Physiol; 1987 Oct; 9(5):429-39. PubMed ID: 3693822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
    Kanno A, Nakasato N, Fujiwara S, Yoshimoto T.
    No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.