These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

172 related items for PubMed ID: 3438702

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of prolonged lack of amplification on speech-recognition performance: preliminary findings.
    Silman S, Silverman CA, Emmer MB, Gelfand SA.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(3):326-32. PubMed ID: 8126657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Apparent auditory deprivation in children: implications of monaural versus binaural amplification.
    Gelfand SA, Silman S.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Sep; 4(5):313-8. PubMed ID: 8219298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Listeners who prefer monaural to binaural hearing aids.
    Carter AS, Noe CM, Wilson RH.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 May; 12(5):261-72. PubMed ID: 11392438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Performance-intensity functions as a predictor for binaural amplification.
    Mueller HG, Grimes AM, Jerome JJ.
    Ear Hear; 1981 May; 2(5):211-4. PubMed ID: 7297786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Adult-onset auditory deprivation.
    Silman S, Silverman CA, Emmer MB, Gelfand SA.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Nov; 3(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 1486201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Is the unaided ear effect independent of auditory aging?
    Hurley RM.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1998 Feb; 9(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 9493938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Ear dominance for nonsense-syllable recognition ability in sensorineural hearing-impaired children: monaural versus binaural amplification.
    Hattori H.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Sep; 4(5):319-30. PubMed ID: 8219299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of noise and reverberation on binaural and monaural word identification by subjects with various audiograms.
    Nabelek AK, Mason D.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Sep; 24(3):375-83. PubMed ID: 7300279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
    Dawes P, Munro KJ, Kalluri S, Edwards B.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Sep; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Binaural benefit--when and how much?
    Brooks DN.
    Scand Audiol; 1984 Sep; 13(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 6523042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The impact of head angle on monaural and binaural performance with directional and omnidirectional hearing aids.
    Ricketts T.
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):318-28. PubMed ID: 10981608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.