These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

673 related items for PubMed ID: 34437864

  • 1. Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
    Berger AA, Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):552.e1-552.e7. PubMed ID: 34437864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of 30-Day Readmission After Same-Day Compared With Next-Day Discharge in Minimally Invasive Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.
    Berger AA, Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 135(6):1327-1337. PubMed ID: 32459424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. 30-Day unanticipated healthcare encounters after prolapse surgery: impact of same day discharge.
    Romanova AL, Carter-Brooks C, Ruppert KM, Zyczynski HM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 222(5):482.e1-482.e8. PubMed ID: 31733206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Richter HE, Sridhar A, Nager CW, Komesu YM, Harvie HS, Zyczynski HM, Rardin C, Visco A, Mazloomdoost D, Thomas S, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 228(1):63.e1-63.e16. PubMed ID: 35931131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes, Readmission, and Reoperation for Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation, Uterosacral Ligament Suspension, and Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Yadav GS, Gaddam N, Rahn DD.
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar 01; 27(3):133-139. PubMed ID: 33620894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Cardenas-Trowers O, Stewart JR, Meriwether KV, Francis SL, Gupta A.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Mar 01; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Prolapse recurrence following sacrocolpopexy vs uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparison stratified by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage.
    Lavelle ES, Giugale LE, Winger DG, Wang L, Carter-Brooks CM, Shepherd JP.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan 01; 218(1):116.e1-116.e5. PubMed ID: 28951262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes for Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Nonmesh Vaginal Surgery.
    Linder BJ, Gershman B, Bews KA, Glasgow AE, Occhino JA.
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jan 01; 25(5):342-346. PubMed ID: 30628947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Longitudinal Reoperation Risk After Apical Prolapse Procedures in Women Aged 65 Years and Older.
    Berger AA, Bretschneider CE, Gregory WT, Sung V.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar 01; 143(3):411-418. PubMed ID: 38227947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Perioperative Complications in Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Transvaginal Mesh in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Analysis of a National Multi-institutional Dataset.
    Kisby CK, Occhino JA, Bews KA, Habermann EB, Linder BJ.
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb 01; 27(2):72-77. PubMed ID: 31094716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Preoperative prolapse phenotype is predictive of surgical outcome with minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.
    Lowder JL, Zhao P, Bradley MS, Giugale LE, Xu H, Abramowitch SD, Bayly PV.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Sep 01; 231(3):332.e1-332.e12. PubMed ID: 38642697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of Same-Day Discharge on 30-Day Readmission Rates in Women Aged 65 Years and Older Undergoing Minimally Invasive Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.
    Berger AA, Bretschneider CE, Gregory WT, Sung V.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jul 01; 142(1):170-177. PubMed ID: 37290098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The incidence of transfusion and associated risk factors in pelvic reconstructive surgery.
    Pandya LK, Lynch CD, Hundley AF, Nekkanti S, Hudson CO.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov 01; 217(5):612.e1-612.e8. PubMed ID: 28709582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Implementation of a urogynecology-specific enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway.
    Carter-Brooks CM, Du AL, Ruppert KM, Romanova AL, Zyczynski HM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov 01; 219(5):495.e1-495.e10. PubMed ID: 29913175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Readmission and Prolapse Recurrence After Abdominal and Vaginal Apical Suspensions in Older Women.
    Sanses TVD, Hanley JM, Zhang P, Richter HE, Gambert SR, Saigal CS.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec 01; 128(6):1369-1377. PubMed ID: 27824746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R, Chill HH, Levin G, Reuveni-Salzman A, Shveiky D.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan 01; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 34.