These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
183 related items for PubMed ID: 34464537
1. Informational Masking Effects of Speech Versus Nonspeech Noise on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials. Vander Werff KR, Niemczak CE, Morse K. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Oct 04; 64(10):4014-4029. PubMed ID: 34464537 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change. Niemczak CE, Vander Werff KR. Ear Hear; 2019 Oct 04; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Informational Masking Effects of Similarity and Uncertainty on Early and Late Stages of Auditory Cortical Processing. Niemczak CE, Vander Werff KR. Ear Hear; 2021 Oct 04; 42(4):1006-1023. PubMed ID: 33416259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task. Jones JA, Freyman RL. Ear Hear; 2012 Oct 04; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Auditory cortex is susceptible to lexical influence as revealed by informational vs. energetic masking of speech categorization. Carter JA, Bidelman GM. Brain Res; 2021 May 15; 1759():147385. PubMed ID: 33631210 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Release from perceptual masking for children and adults: benefit of a carrier phrase. Bonino AY, Leibold LJ, Buss E. Ear Hear; 2013 May 15; 34(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 22836239 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of energetic and informational masking on The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN). Wilson RH, Trivette CP, Williams DA, Watts KL. J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May 15; 23(7):522-33. PubMed ID: 22992259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Neural encoding and perception of speech signals in informational masking. Bennett KO, Billings CJ, Molis MR, Leek MR. Ear Hear; 2012 May 15; 33(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 22367094 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of Two-Talker Maskers That Differ in Talker Congruity and Perceptual Similarity to the Target Speech. Calandruccio L, Buss E, Bowdrie K. Trends Hear; 2017 May 15; 21():2331216517709385. PubMed ID: 29169315 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults. Leibold LJ, Yarnell Bonino A, Buss E. Ear Hear; 2016 May 15; 37(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26783855 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Distinct neural systems recruited when speech production is modulated by different masking sounds. Meekings S, Evans S, Lavan N, Boebinger D, Krieger-Redwood K, Cooke M, Scott SK. J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul 15; 140(1):8. PubMed ID: 27475128 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Spectral and temporal changes to speech produced in the presence of energetic and informational maskers. Cooke M, Lu Y. J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct 15; 128(4):2059-69. PubMed ID: 20968376 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Intelligibility of Noise-Adapted and Clear Speech in Energetic and Informational Maskers for Native and Nonnative Listeners. Meemann K, Smiljanić R. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Apr 04; 65(4):1263-1281. PubMed ID: 35235410 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Similarity, uncertainty, and masking in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns. Kidd G, Mason CR, Arbogast TL. J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar 04; 111(3):1367-76. PubMed ID: 11931314 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Listening to speech in a background of other talkers: effects of talker number and noise vocoding. Rosen S, Souza P, Ekelund C, Majeed AA. J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr 04; 133(4):2431-43. PubMed ID: 23556608 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of speech and speechlike maskers on unaided and aided speech recognition in persons with hearing loss. Hornsby BW, Ricketts TA, Johnson EE. J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Jun 04; 17(6):432-47. PubMed ID: 16869056 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech perception with music maskers by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. Eskridge EN, Galvin JJ, Aronoff JM, Li T, Fu QJ. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun 04; 55(3):800-10. PubMed ID: 22223890 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Individual differences and age effects in a dichotic informational masking paradigm. Wightman FL, Kistler DJ, O'Bryan A. J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul 04; 128(1):270-9. PubMed ID: 20649222 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Effect of Signal to Noise Ratio on Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials Elicited to Speech Stimuli in Infants and Adults With Normal Hearing. Small SA, Sharma M, Bradford M, Mandikal Vasuki PR. Ear Hear; 2018 Jul 04; 39(2):305-317. PubMed ID: 28863034 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]