These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
186 related items for PubMed ID: 34492503
1. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in studies of fatigue-induced postural control alterations in healthy adults: Scoping review of quantitative evidence. Jo D, Bilodeau M. Gait Posture; 2021 Oct; 90():167-178. PubMed ID: 34492503 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of RPE (Rating of Perceived Exertion) Scales for Session RPE. Arney BE, Glover R, Fusco A, Cortis C, de Koning JJ, van Erp T, Jaime S, Mikat RP, Porcari JP, Foster C. Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2019 Jul 01; 14(7):994-996. PubMed ID: 30569764 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of Subjective Perceived Exertion at the Anaerobic Threshold with the Borg CR-10 Scale. Zamunér AR, Moreno MA, Camargo TM, Graetz JP, Rebelo AC, Tamburús NY, da Silva E. J Sports Sci Med; 2011 Jul 01; 10(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 24149305 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A rating of perceived exertion scale using facial expressions for conveying exercise intensity for children and young adults. Chen YL, Chiou WK, Tzeng YT, Lu CY, Chen SC. J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jan 01; 20(1):66-69. PubMed ID: 27267301 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Rating of perceived exertion as a tool for managing exercise intensity during pregnancy: a scoping review. Gjestvang C, Olsen ML, Dalhaug EM, Haakstad LAH. BMJ Open; 2024 Oct 16; 14(10):e086682. PubMed ID: 39414299 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Exercise Prescription Using a Group-Normalized Rating of Perceived Exertion in Adolescents and Adults With Spina Bifida. Crytzer TM, Keramati M, Anthony SJ, Cheng YT, Robertson RJ, Dicianno BE. PM R; 2018 Jul 16; 10(7):738-747. PubMed ID: 29408563 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Commonly Used Subjective Effort Scales May Not Predict Directly Measured Physical Workloads and Fatigue in Hispanic Farmworkers. Thamsuwan O, Galvin K, Palmandez P, Johnson PW. Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb 05; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 36833506 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and validity of the Borg and OMNI rating of perceived exertion scales in adolescent girls. Pfeiffer KA, Pivarnik JM, Womack CJ, Reeves MJ, Malina RM. Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2002 Dec 05; 34(12):2057-61. PubMed ID: 12471316 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity of rating of perceived exertion during graded exercise testing in apparently healthy adults and cardiac patients. Whaley MH, Brubaker PH, Kaminsky LA, Miller CR. J Cardiopulm Rehabil; 1997 Dec 05; 17(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 9271770 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of two Borg exertion scales for monitoring exercise intensity in able-bodied participants, and those with paraplegia and tetraplegia. Hutchinson MJ, Kouwijzer I, de Groot S, Goosey-Tolfrey VL. Spinal Cord; 2021 Nov 05; 59(11):1162-1169. PubMed ID: 34040150 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The development of rating of perceived exertion-based tests of physical working capacity. Mielke M, Housh TJ, Malek MH, Beck TW, Schmidt RJ, Johnson GO. J Strength Cond Res; 2008 Jan 05; 22(1):293-302. PubMed ID: 18296989 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of the color scale of perceived exertion: preliminary validation. Serafim TH, Tognato AC, Nakamura PM, Queiroga MR, Nakamura FY, Pereira G, Kokubun E. Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Dec 05; 119(3):884-900. PubMed ID: 25387039 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Face Pain Scale and Borg Scale compared to physiological parameters during cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Morishita S, Tsubaki A, Hotta K, Inoue T, Qin W, Kojima S, Fu JB, Onishi H. J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2021 Nov 05; 61(11):1464-1468. PubMed ID: 33269889 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Use of Ratings of Perceived Exertion in Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review. Kasai D, Parfitt G, Tarca B, Eston R, Tsiros MD. Sports Med; 2021 Jan 05; 51(1):33-50. PubMed ID: 33206334 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison between three rating scales for perceived exertion and two different work tests. Borg E, Kaijser L. Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2006 Feb 05; 16(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 16430682 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity of rating of perceived exertion ranges in individuals in the subacute stage of stroke recovery. Sage M, Middleton LE, Tang A, Sibley KM, Brooks D, McIlroy W. Top Stroke Rehabil; 2013 Feb 05; 20(6):519-27. PubMed ID: 24273299 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and Validity of Ratings of Perceived Exertion in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis. Cleland BT, Ingraham BA, Pitluck MC, Woo D, Ng AV. Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2016 Jun 05; 97(6):974-82. PubMed ID: 26836954 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity and reliability of rating perceived exertion in women with fibromyalgia: exertion-pain discrimination. Soriano-Maldonado A, Ruiz JR, Álvarez-Gallardo IC, Segura-Jiménez V, Santalla A, Munguía-Izquierdo D. J Sports Sci; 2015 Jun 05; 33(14):1515-22. PubMed ID: 25537003 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Criterion-related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. Chen MJ, Fan X, Moe ST. J Sports Sci; 2002 Nov 05; 20(11):873-99. PubMed ID: 12430990 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the Adult OMNI Scale of perceived exertion for walking/running exercise. Utter AC, Robertson RJ, Green JM, Suminski RR, McAnulty SR, Nieman DC. Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2004 Oct 05; 36(10):1776-80. PubMed ID: 15595300 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]