These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

189 related items for PubMed ID: 34538126

  • 1. The effect of range of motion simulated with a patient-specific three-dimensional simulation analysis on dislocation after total hip arthroplasty.
    Mitsutake R, Tanino H, Ito H.
    Hip Int; 2023 Mar; 33(2):313-322. PubMed ID: 34538126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA.
    Murphy WS, Yun HH, Hayden B, Kowal JH, Murphy SB.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 29529664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Influence of hip center position, anterior inferior iliac spine morphology, and ball head diameter on range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Tabata T, Kaku N, Tagomori H, Tsumura H.
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Feb; 105(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 30509621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Hip stability after total hip arthroplasty predicted by intraoperative stability test and range of motion: a cross-sectional study.
    Tanino H, Sato T, Nishida Y, Mitsutake R, Ito H.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Oct 15; 19(1):373. PubMed ID: 30322394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Range of Motion to Impingement Curves Create a New Patient-Specific Impingement-Free Zone for Acetabular Cup Placement.
    McCarthy TF, Thompson MT, Nevelos J, Salem HS, Naylor BH, Mont MA.
    Surg Technol Int; 2021 May 20; 38():400-406. PubMed ID: 33565600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components.
    Widmer KH.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Aug 20; 478(8):1904-1918. PubMed ID: 32732575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cup safe zone and optimal stem anteversion in total hip arthroplasty for patients with highly required range of motion.
    Habe Y, Hamada H, Uemura K, Takashima K, Ando W, Sugano N.
    J Orthop Res; 2024 Jun 20; 42(6):1283-1291. PubMed ID: 38084832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Simulation of Implant Impingement After Spinal Corrective Fusion Surgery in Patients with Previous Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case Series.
    Yamato Y, Furuhashi H, Hasegawa T, Yoshida G, Yasuda T, Banno T, Oe S, Arima H, Shimizu Y, Hoshino H, Matsuyama Y.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Apr 15; 46(8):512-519. PubMed ID: 33273444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.