These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

249 related items for PubMed ID: 34570379

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Savdie R, Horvath LG, Benito RP, Rasiah KK, Haynes AM, Chatfield M, Stricker PD, Turner JJ, Delprado W, Henshall SM, Sutherland RL, Kench JG.
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence following radical perineal prostatectomy in a large contemporary series: a detailed assessment of margin extent and location.
    Sammon JD, Trinh QD, Sukumar S, Ravi P, Friedman A, Sun M, Schmitges J, Jeldres C, Jeong W, Mander N, Peabody JO, Karakiewicz PI, Harris M.
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1470-6. PubMed ID: 22534086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Preisser F, Coxilha G, Heinze A, Oh S, Chun FK, Sauter G, Pompe RS, Huland H, Graefen M, Tilki D.
    Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Risk of biochemical recurrence based on extent and location of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Marcq G, Michelet A, Hannink G, Rizk J, Sauvain J, Villers A, Saffarini M, Rochat CH.
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Dec 27; 18(1):1291. PubMed ID: 30587172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Defining Clinically Meaningful Positive Surgical Margins in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer.
    Martini A, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Scuderi S, Bravi CA, Mazzone E, Stabile A, Scarcella S, Robesti D, Barletta F, Cucchiara V, Mirone V, Montorsi F, Briganti A.
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Feb 27; 4(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 31411971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Chapin BF, Nguyen JN, Achim MF, Navai N, Williams SB, Prokhorova IN, Wang X, Tapia EMLN, Davis JW, Troncoso P.
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Jun 27; 21(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 29230008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Shikanov S, Marchetti P, Desai V, Razmaria A, Antic T, Al-Ahmadie H, Zagaja G, Eggener S, Brendler C, Shalhav A.
    BJU Int; 2013 Apr 27; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy.
    Evren I, Hacıislamoğlu A, Ekşi M, Yavuzsan AH, Baytekin F, Çolakoğlu Y, Canoğlu D, Tugcu V.
    Int Braz J Urol; 2019 Apr 27; 45(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 30325603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus.
    Maxeiner A, Magheli A, Jöhrens K, Kilic E, Braun TL, Kempkensteffen C, Hinz S, Stephan C, Miller K, Busch J.
    BJU Int; 2016 Nov 27; 118(5):750-757. PubMed ID: 26915345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Long-term oncological outcomes of apical positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital cohort.
    Wadhwa H, Terris MK, Aronson WJ, Kane CJ, Amling CL, Cooperberg MR, Freedland SJ, Abern MR.
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2016 Dec 27; 19(4):423-428. PubMed ID: 27698440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality.
    Chalfin HJ, Dinizo M, Trock BJ, Feng Z, Partin AW, Walsh PC, Humphreys E, Han M.
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec 27; 110(11):1684-9. PubMed ID: 22788795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.