These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


695 related items for PubMed ID: 34582852

  • 1. Assessment of benthic invertebrate diversity and river ecological status along an urbanized gradient using environmental DNA metabarcoding and a traditional survey method.
    Ji F, Han D, Yan L, Yan S, Zha J, Shen J.
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb 01; 806(Pt 2):150587. PubMed ID: 34582852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Estimating aquatic plant diversity and distribution in rivers from Jingjinji region, China, using environmental DNA metabarcoding and a traditional survey method.
    Ji F, Yan L, Yan S, Qin T, Shen J, Zha J.
    Environ Res; 2021 Aug 01; 199():111348. PubMed ID: 34029550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Taxonomic accuracy and complementarity between bulk and eDNA metabarcoding provides an alternative to morphology for biological assessment of freshwater macroinvertebrates.
    Múrria C, Wangensteen OS, Somma S, Väisänen L, Fortuño P, Arnedo MA, Prat N.
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jul 20; 935():173243. PubMed ID: 38761946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Modeling the ecological status response of rivers to multiple stressors using machine learning: A comparison of environmental DNA metabarcoding and morphological data.
    Fan J, Wang S, Li H, Yan Z, Zhang Y, Zheng X, Wang P.
    Water Res; 2020 Sep 15; 183():116004. PubMed ID: 32622231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods.
    Pawlowski J, Bruce K, Panksep K, Aguirre FI, Amalfitano S, Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L, Baussant T, Bouchez A, Carugati L, Cermakova K, Cordier T, Corinaldesi C, Costa FO, Danovaro R, Dell'Anno A, Duarte S, Eisendle U, Ferrari BJD, Frontalini F, Frühe L, Haegerbaeumer A, Kisand V, Krolicka A, Lanzén A, Leese F, Lejzerowicz F, Lyautey E, Maček I, Sagova-Marečková M, Pearman JK, Pochon X, Stoeck T, Vivien R, Weigand A, Fazi S.
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Apr 20; 818():151783. PubMed ID: 34801504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool to monitor fish diversity in Beijing water systems compared with ground cages.
    Shen M, Xiao N, Zhao Z, Guo N, Luo Z, Sun G, Li J.
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jun 30; 12(1):11113. PubMed ID: 35773335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Assessing the impact of the threatened crucian carp (Carassius carassius) on pond invertebrate diversity: A comparison of conventional and molecular tools.
    Harper LR, Lawson Handley L, Sayer CD, Read DS, Benucci M, Blackman RC, Hill MJ, Hänfling B.
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul 30; 30(13):3252-3269. PubMed ID: 33002225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Assessing benthic macroinvertebrate communities' spatial heterogeneity in Mediterranean transitional waters through eDNA metabarcoding.
    Pinna M, Zangaro F, Specchia V.
    Sci Rep; 2024 Aug 02; 14(1):17890. PubMed ID: 39095544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Hidden diversity: DNA metabarcoding reveals hyper-diverse benthic invertebrate communities.
    Gleason JE, Hanner RH, Cottenie K.
    BMC Ecol Evol; 2023 May 17; 23(1):19. PubMed ID: 37198575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. New insights into biologic interpretation of bioinformatic pipelines for fish eDNA metabarcoding: A case study in Pearl River estuary.
    Li Z, Zhao W, Jiang Y, Wen Y, Li M, Liu L, Zou K.
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Sep 17; 368():122136. PubMed ID: 39128344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The future of fish-based ecological assessment of European rivers: from traditional EU Water Framework Directive compliant methods to eDNA metabarcoding-based approaches.
    Pont D, Valentini A, Rocle M, Maire A, Delaigue O, Jean P, Dejean T.
    J Fish Biol; 2021 Feb 17; 98(2):354-366. PubMed ID: 31644817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effects of sampling strategies and DNA extraction methods on eDNA metabarcoding: A case study of estuarine fish diversity monitoring.
    Ruan HT, Wang RL, Li HT, Liu L, Kuang TX, Li M, Zou KS.
    Zool Res; 2022 Mar 18; 43(2):192-204. PubMed ID: 35084125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool for monitoring fish diversity in a coastal wetland of the Pearl River Estuary compared to bottom trawling.
    Zou K, Chen J, Ruan H, Li Z, Guo W, Li M, Liu L.
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb 01; 702():134704. PubMed ID: 31726353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Consideration of Multitrophic Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functions Improves Indices on River Ecological Status.
    Li F, Zhang Y, Altermatt F, Zhang X.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Dec 21; 55(24):16434-16444. PubMed ID: 34882399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Analysis of 13,312 benthic invertebrate samples from German streams reveals minor deviations in ecological status class between abundance and presence/absence data.
    Buchner D, Beermann AJ, Laini A, Rolauffs P, Vitecek S, Hering D, Leese F.
    PLoS One; 2019 Dec 21; 14(12):e0226547. PubMed ID: 31869356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Using environmental DNA metabarcoding to monitor fish communities in small rivers and large brooks: Insights on the spatial scale of information.
    Van Driessche C, Everts T, Neyrinck S, Halfmaerten D, Haegeman A, Ruttink T, Bonte D, Brys R.
    Environ Res; 2023 Jul 01; 228():115857. PubMed ID: 37059322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Spatial Representativeness of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Signal for Fish Biodiversity Assessment in a Natural Freshwater System.
    Civade R, Dejean T, Valentini A, Roset N, Raymond JC, Bonin A, Taberlet P, Pont D.
    PLoS One; 2016 Jul 01; 11(6):e0157366. PubMed ID: 27359116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of water samples as a tool for monitoring Iberian freshwater fish composition.
    Corral-Lou A, Doadrio I.
    PLoS One; 2023 Jul 01; 18(10):e0283088. PubMed ID: 37903086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Diatom eDNA metabarcoding and morphological methods for bioassessment of karstic river.
    Kulaš A, Gligora Udovič M, Tapolczai K, Žutinić P, Orlić S, Levkov Z.
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jul 10; 829():154536. PubMed ID: 35304150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Molecular identity crisis: environmental DNA metabarcoding meets traditional taxonomy-assessing biodiversity and freshwater mussel populations (Unionidae) in Alabama.
    Hauck LL, Atkinson CL, Homyack JA, Penaluna BE, Mangum C, Coble AA, Nettles J, Thornton-Frost JE, Fix MJ.
    PeerJ; 2023 Jul 10; 11():e15127. PubMed ID: 37033728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 35.