These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
160 related items for PubMed ID: 3458908
1. Comparison of an electronic and a mechanical pantograph. Part I: Consistency of an electronic computerized pantograph to record articulator settings. Beard CC, Donaldson K, Clayton JA. J Prosthet Dent; 1986 May; 55(5):570-4. PubMed ID: 3458908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of articulator settings obtained by using an electronic pantograph and lateral interocclusal recordings. Price RB, Bannerman RA. J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Aug; 60(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 3172002 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An in vitro study of an electronic pantograph. Anderson GC, Schulte JK, Arnold TG. J Prosthet Dent; 1987 May; 57(5):577-80. PubMed ID: 3474405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A graphic comparison of mandibular border movements generated by various articulators. Part II: Results. Hatano Y, Kolling JN, Stern N, Clayton JA. J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Apr; 61(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 2724155 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A graphic comparison of mandibular border movements generated by various articulators. Part I: Methodology. Stern N, Hatano Y, Kolling JN, Clayton JA. J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Aug; 60(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 3172004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the intercondylar distance and the interfacial width as used with the electronic pantograph. Mandilaris CB, Beard CC, Clayton JA. J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Mar; 67(3):331-4. PubMed ID: 1507096 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Stabilizing the pantograph from patient to articulator. Schneider RL. J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Aug; 52(2):310. PubMed ID: 6590847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Technique for transferring information from a pantograph tracing to semiadjustable articulators. Gordon SR, Stoffer WM. J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Oct; 54(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 3862808 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of condylar control settings using three methods: a bench study. Pelletier LB, Campbell SD. J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 1774679 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Observations on the use of the Denar pantograph and articulator. Winstanley RB. J Prosthet Dent; 1977 Dec; 38(6):660-72. PubMed ID: 271716 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of mandibular movements recorded by two pantographs. Donaldson K, Clayton JA. J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Jan; 55(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 3456048 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro evaluation of the reliability and validity of an electronic pantograph by testing with five different articulators. Chang WS, Romberg E, Driscoll CF, Tabacco MJ. J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jul; 92(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 15232566 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]