These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

362 related items for PubMed ID: 3461735

  • 1. Bionator treatment in Class II, division 1.
    Bolmgren GA, Moshiri F.
    Angle Orthod; 1986 Jul; 56(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 3461735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP, da Rosa Martins JC, Martins LP, Buschang PH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Correction of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions through the use of the Bionator appliance. Report of two cases.
    Rutter RR, Witt E.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Feb; 97(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 2301297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Long-term effectiveness and treatment timing for Bionator therapy.
    Faltin KJ, Faltin RM, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Ghiozzi B, McNamara JA.
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 12828429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Treatment of Class II malocclusion using the Herbst appliance].
    Schiavoni R.
    Mondo Ortod; 1990 Jun; 15(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 2402252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Vertical control in fully-banded orthodontic treatment.
    Pearson LE.
    Angle Orthod; 1986 Jul; 56(3):205-24. PubMed ID: 3461731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The mandibular plane angle in activator treatment.
    Pancherz H.
    Angle Orthod; 1979 Jan; 49(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 283705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
    Dolce C, McGorray SP, Brazeau L, King GJ, Wheeler TT.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of arch dimension changes in 1-phase vs 2-phase treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    Wortham JR, Dolce C, McGorray SP, Le H, King GJ, Wheeler TT.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 19577150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Functional orthopedic treatment: the Frankel appliance in Class II div. 1].
    De Cecco G, Pietrobattista A.
    Dent Cadmos; 1986 Dec 15; 54(19):89-93. PubMed ID: 3472938
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Mandibular response to orthodontic treatment with the Bionator appliance.
    Mamandras AH, Allen LP.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Feb 15; 97(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 2301298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The use of the bionator appliance in the treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion in the late mixed dentition.
    Tsamtsouris A, Vedrenne D.
    J Pedod; 1983 Feb 15; 8(1):78-104. PubMed ID: 6584584
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.