These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

138 related items for PubMed ID: 34652249

  • 1. Diagnostic capacity and interobserver variability in FIGO, ACOG, NICE and Chandraharan cardiotocographic guidelines to predict neonatal acidemia.
    Zamora Del Pozo C, Chóliz Ezquerro M, Mejía I, Díaz de Terán Martínez-Berganza E, Esteban LM, Rivero Alonso A, Castán Larraz B, Andeyro García M, Savirón Cornudella R.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):8498-8506. PubMed ID: 34652249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Agreement and accuracy using the FIGO, ACOG and NICE cardiotocography interpretation guidelines.
    Santo S, Ayres-de-Campos D, Costa-Santos C, Schnettler W, Ugwumadu A, Da Graça LM, FM-Compare Collaboration.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Feb; 96(2):166-175. PubMed ID: 27869985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Diagnostic Accuracy of the FIGO and the 5-Tier Fetal Heart Rate Classification Systems in the Detection of Neonatal Acidemia.
    Martí Gamboa S, Giménez OR, Mancho JP, Moros ML, Sada JR, Mateo SC.
    Am J Perinatol; 2017 Apr; 34(5):508-514. PubMed ID: 27780275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Performance of five cardiotocography classification templates in labor: a cohort study.
    Kling D, Rehnström M, Herbst A.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2024 Dec; 37(1):2394845. PubMed ID: 39198035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Total intrapartum fetal reperfusion time (fetal resilience) and neonatal acidemia.
    Chóliz Ezquerro M, Savirón Cornudella R, Esteban LM, Zamora Del Pozo C, Espiau Romera A, Castán Larraz B, Castán Mateo S.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):6466-6475. PubMed ID: 33938352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Impaired validity of the new FIGO and Swedish CTG classification templates to identify fetal acidosis in the first stage of labor.
    Ekengård F, Cardell M, Herbst A.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):4853-4860. PubMed ID: 33406946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A cross-sectional comparison of three guidelines for intrapartum cardiotocography.
    Bhatia M, Mahtani KR, Nunan D, Reddy A.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jul; 138(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 28346664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of Four Intrapartum Cardiotocography Classifications for Predicting Neonatal Acidemia at Birth.
    Troha N, Razem K, Luzovec U, Lucovnik M.
    J Pregnancy; 2023 Jul; 2023():5853889. PubMed ID: 36814692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Rei M, Tavares S, Pinto P, Machado AP, Monteiro S, Costa A, Costa-Santos C, Bernardes J, Ayres-De-Campos D.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():27-31. PubMed ID: 27566218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A prospective cohort study of fetal heart rate monitoring: deceleration area is predictive of fetal acidemia.
    Cahill AG, Tuuli MG, Stout MJ, López JD, Macones GA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 218(5):523.e1-523.e12. PubMed ID: 29408586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Interobserver agreement in analysis of cardiotocograms recorded during trial of labor after cesarean.
    Caning MM, Thisted DLA, Amer-Wählin I, Laier GH, Krebs L.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3778-3783. PubMed ID: 29724142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Is the fetus fit for labor? Introducing fast-and-frugal trees (FFTrees) to simplify triage of women for STAN monitoring: An interobserver agreement comparison with traditional classification.
    Pereira S, Bakker P, Zaima A, Ghi T, Kessler J, Timonen S, Vayssière C, Löser K, Holmberg K, Jacquemyn Y, Chandraharan E, Wertheim D, Olofsson P.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2024 Jan; 103(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 37890863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of five classification systems for interpreting electronic fetal monitoring in predicting neonatal status at birth.
    Di Tommaso M, Seravalli V, Cordisco A, Consorti G, Mecacci F, Rizzello F.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Mar; 26(5):487-90. PubMed ID: 23039108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Types of intrapartum hypoxia in the newborn at term with metabolic acidemia: A retrospective study.
    Descourvieres L, Ghesquiere L, Drumez E, Martin C, Sauvage A, Subtil D, Houfflin-Debarge V, Garabedian C.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Nov; 101(11):1276-1281. PubMed ID: 36004701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Cardiotocographic findings in the second stage of labor among fetuses delivered with acidemia: a comparison of two classification systems.
    Ghi T, Morganelli G, Bellussi F, Rucci P, Giorgetta F, Rizzo N, Frusca T, Pilu G.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():297-302. PubMed ID: 27423030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Quantification of Posterior Risk Related to Intrapartum FIGO 2015 Criteria for Cardiotocography in the Second Stage of Labor.
    Cavoretto PI, Seidenari A, Amodeo S, Della Gatta AN, Nale R, Ismail YS, Candiani M, Farina A.
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2021 Aug; 48(2):149-157. PubMed ID: 33508830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Large-scale analysis of interobserver agreement and reliability in cardiotocography interpretation during labor using an online tool.
    Ben M'Barek I, Ben M'Barek B, Jauvion G, Holmström E, Agman A, Merrer J, Ceccaldi PF.
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2024 Feb 14; 24(1):136. PubMed ID: 38355457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Estimation of neonatal outcome artery pH value according to CTG interpretation of the last 60 min before delivery: a retrospective study. Can the outcome pH value be predicted?
    Kundu S, Kuehnle E, Schippert C, von Ehr J, Hillemanns P, Staboulidou I.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Nov 14; 296(5):897-905. PubMed ID: 28879450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Inter-observer reliability of 4 fetal heart rate classifications.
    Garabedian C, Butruille L, Drumez E, Servan Schreiber E, Bartolo S, Bleu G, Mesdag V, Deruelle P, De Jonckheere J, Houfflin-Debarge V.
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb 14; 46(2):131-135. PubMed ID: 28403968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Deceleration area and fetal acidemia.
    Martí Gamboa S, Lapresta Moros M, Pascual Mancho J, Lapresta Moros C, Castán Mateo S.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Nov 14; 30(21):2578-2584. PubMed ID: 27819172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.