These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

204 related items for PubMed ID: 3466496

  • 1. DNA-cytometric diagnosis of prospective malignancy in borderline lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Böcking A, Hilgarth M, Auffermann W, Hack-Werdier C, Fischer-Becker D, von Kalkreuth G.
    Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 3466496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Diagnosis of prospective malignancy in koilocytic dysplasias of the cervix with DNA cytometry.
    Chatelain R, Schunck T, Schindler EM, Schindler AE, Böcking A.
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Aug; 34(8):505-10. PubMed ID: 2810239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. False-negative Papanicolaou smears from women with cancerous and precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Pairwuti S.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Aug; 35(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 1994633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Diagnosis of prospective malignancy of cervix dysplasia using DNA cytometry].
    Bollmann R.
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1990 Feb; 50(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 2318402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. False-positive squamous cell carcinoma in cervical smears: cytologic-histologic correlation in 19 cases.
    Levine PH, Elgert PA, Mittal K.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jan; 28(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12508178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
    Liao SY, Stanbridge EJ.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The accuracy and consistency of the cytologic classification of squamous lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Kern Wh, Zivolich MR.
    Acta Cytol; 1977 Jul; 21(4):519-23. PubMed ID: 269601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cytologic and histologic diagnosis and significance of controversial squamous lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Duggan MA.
    Mod Pathol; 2000 Mar; 13(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 10757336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cytomorphologic and cytochemical analysis in the differential diagnosis of cervical epithelial lesions.
    Nasiell K, Näslund I, Auer G.
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1984 Sep; 6(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 6508037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Diagnostic accuracy of squamous cervical lesions studied in spatula-cytobrush smears.
    Alons-van Kordelaar JJ, Boon ME.
    Acta Cytol; 1988 Sep; 32(6):801-4. PubMed ID: 3059733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Early progression stage of malignancy of uterine cervical dysplasia as revealed by immunohistochemical demonstration of increased DNA-instability.
    Khaled A, Imamura Y, Noriki S, Fukuda M.
    Eur J Histochem; 2000 Sep; 44(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 10968362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The identification of atypical reserve cells in smears of patients with premalignant and malignant changes in the squamous and glandular epithelium of the uterine cervix.
    Beyer-Boon ME, Verdonk GW.
    Acta Cytol; 1978 Sep; 22(5):305-11. PubMed ID: 281835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Algorithm for a DNA-cytophotometric diagnosis and grading of malignancy.
    Böcking A, Adler CP, Common HH, Hilgarth M, Granzen B, Auffermann W.
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1984 Mar; 6(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 6547281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Laboratory reliability of the Papanicolaou smear.
    Yobs AR, Swanson RA, Lamotte LC.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Feb; 65(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 3969236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Cytophotometric study of premalignant and malignant cells of the cervix in an approach towards automated cytology.
    Nishiya I, Kikuchi T, Moriya S, Shimotomai K, Sawamura I.
    Acta Cytol; 1977 Feb; 21(2):271-5. PubMed ID: 266337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Human papillomavirus DNA detection in cervical specimens by hybrid capture: correlation with cytologic and histologic diagnoses of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix.
    Hall S, Lörincz A, Shah F, Sherman ME, Abbas F, Paull G, Kurman RJ, Shah KV.
    Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Sep; 62(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 8812532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Allahverdian V, Valaitis J, Kalis O, Pearlman S.
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of the special properties of monolayer cell preparations for automated cervical cytology on visual evaluation and classification. With an estimation of the number of cells required to be screened.
    Schwarz G, Schwarz M, Schenck U.
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1983 Sep; 5(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 6651018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The validation of cervical cytology. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values.
    Soost HJ, Lange HJ, Lehmacher W, Ruffing-Kullmann B.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Sep; 35(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 1994641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Argyrophilic proteins in the nucleolar organizer in the differential diagnosis of cervical dysplasias and cancer].
    Diadyk EA, Vasilenko IV, Smirnova EA, Raĭkhlin NT.
    Arkh Patol; 1993 Sep; 55(2):23-7. PubMed ID: 7980057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.