These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

218 related items for PubMed ID: 34674014

  • 1. Host Defense Metabolites Alter the Interactions between a Bark Beetle and its Symbiotic Fungi.
    Agbulu V, Zaman R, Ishangulyyeva G, Cahill JF, Erbilgin N.
    Microb Ecol; 2022 Oct; 84(3):834-843. PubMed ID: 34674014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Rapid monoterpene induction promotes the susceptibility of a novel host pine to mountain pine beetle colonization but not to beetle-vectored fungi.
    Cale JA, Muskens M, Najar A, Ishangulyyeva G, Hussain A, Kanekar SS, Klutsch JG, Taft S, Erbilgin N.
    Tree Physiol; 2017 Dec 01; 37(12):1597-1610. PubMed ID: 28985375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Water-deficit and fungal infection can differentially affect the production of different classes of defense compounds in two host pines of mountain pine beetle.
    Erbilgin N, Cale JA, Lusebrink I, Najar A, Klutsch JG, Sherwood P, Enrico Bonello P, Evenden ML.
    Tree Physiol; 2017 Mar 01; 37(3):338-350. PubMed ID: 27881799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Production of complementary defense metabolites reflects a co-evolutionary arms race between a host plant and a mutualistic bark beetle-fungal complex.
    Ullah A, Klutsch JG, Erbilgin N.
    Plant Cell Environ; 2021 Sep 01; 44(9):3064-3077. PubMed ID: 34008191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Bacteria influence mountain pine beetle brood development through interactions with symbiotic and antagonistic fungi: implications for climate-driven host range expansion.
    Therrien J, Mason CJ, Cale JA, Adams A, Aukema BH, Currie CR, Raffa KF, Erbilgin N.
    Oecologia; 2015 Oct 01; 179(2):467-85. PubMed ID: 26037523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Conifer-killing bark beetles locate fungal symbionts by detecting volatile fungal metabolites of host tree resin monoterpenes.
    Kandasamy D, Zaman R, Nakamura Y, Zhao T, Hartmann H, Andersson MN, Hammerbacher A, Gershenzon J.
    PLoS Biol; 2023 Feb 01; 21(2):e3001887. PubMed ID: 36802386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Bark Beetles Utilize Ophiostomatoid Fungi to Circumvent Host Tree Defenses.
    Zaman R, May C, Ullah A, Erbilgin N.
    Metabolites; 2023 Feb 06; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 36837858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evidence that Ophiostomatoid Fungal Symbionts of Mountain Pine Beetle Do Not Play a Role in Overcoming Lodgepole Pine Defenses During Mass Attack.
    Fortier CE, Musso AE, Evenden ML, Zaharia LI, Cooke JEK.
    Mol Plant Microbe Interact; 2024 May 06; 37(5):445-458. PubMed ID: 38240660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A Pine in Distress: How Infection by Different Pathogenic Fungi Affect Lodgepole Pine Chemical Defenses.
    Zaman R, Antonioli F, Shah A, Ullah A, May C, Klutsch JG, Erbilgin N.
    Microb Ecol; 2023 Nov 06; 86(4):2666-2673. PubMed ID: 37486583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Mutualistic Ophiostomatoid Fungi Equally Benefit from Both a Bark Beetle Pheromone and Host Tree Volatiles as Nutrient Sources.
    Liu Y, Anastacio GR, Ishangulyyeva G, Rodriguez-Ramos JC, Erbilgin N.
    Microb Ecol; 2021 May 06; 81(4):1106-1110. PubMed ID: 33404818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Induced Defenses of a Novel Host Tree Affect the Growth and Interactions of Bark Beetle-Vectored Fungi.
    Wang F, Cale JA, Erbilgin N.
    Microb Ecol; 2020 Jul 06; 80(1):181-190. PubMed ID: 32020257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A Native Parasitic Plant Systemically Induces Resistance in Jack Pine to a Fungal Symbiont of Invasive Mountain Pine Beetle.
    Klutsch JG, Najar A, Sherwood P, Bonello P, Erbilgin N.
    J Chem Ecol; 2017 May 06; 43(5):506-518. PubMed ID: 28466378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A novel application of RNase H2-dependent quantitative PCR for detection and quantification of Grosmannia clavigera, a mountain pine beetle fungal symbiont, in environmental samples.
    McAllister CH, Fortier CE, St Onge KR, Sacchi BM, Nawrot MJ, Locke T, Cooke JEK.
    Tree Physiol; 2018 Mar 01; 38(3):485-501. PubMed ID: 29329457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Fatty Acid Composition of Novel Host Jack Pine Do Not Prevent Host Acceptance and Colonization by the Invasive Mountain Pine Beetle and Its Symbiotic Fungus.
    Ishangulyyeva G, Najar A, Curtis JM, Erbilgin N.
    PLoS One; 2016 Mar 01; 11(9):e0162046. PubMed ID: 27583820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effects of water potential and solute on the growth and interactions of two fungal symbionts of the mountain pine beetle.
    Bleiker KP, Six DL.
    Mycol Res; 2009 Jan 01; 113(Pt 1):3-15. PubMed ID: 18640273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The relative abundance of mountain pine beetle fungal associates through the beetle life cycle in pine trees.
    Khadempour L, LeMay V, Jack D, Bohlmann J, Breuil C.
    Microb Ecol; 2012 Nov 01; 64(4):909-17. PubMed ID: 22735936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.