These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

186 related items for PubMed ID: 34677622

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance.
    Fuziy A, Rodrigues de Almeida R, Janson G, Angelieri F, Pinzan A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):502-10. PubMed ID: 17045150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Efficiency of the skeletonized Pendulum K appliance for non-compliance maxillary molar distalization : A clinical pilot study.
    Kinzinger GSM, Hourfar J, Lisson JA.
    J Orofac Orthop; 2021 Nov; 82(6):391-402. PubMed ID: 33651171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Pendulum and modified pendulum appliances for maxillary molar distalization in Class II malocclusion - a systematic review.
    Al-Thomali Y, Basha S, Mohamed RN.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2017 Aug; 75(6):394-401. PubMed ID: 28502196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance.
    Caprioglio A, Cozzani M, Fontana M.
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Aug; 15(1):49. PubMed ID: 25139288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Maxillary molar distalization: Pendulum and Fast-Back, comparison between two approaches for Class II malocclusion.
    Caprioglio A, Beretta M, Lanteri C.
    Prog Orthod; 2011 Aug; 12(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 21515227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cytokine levels in gingival crevicular fluid during orthodontic treatment with aligners compared to conventional labial fixed appliances: a 3-week clinical study.
    Gujar AN, Baeshen HA, Alhazmi A, Bhandi S, Raj AT, Patil S, Birkhed D.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Aug; 77(6):474-481. PubMed ID: 31027423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Molar distalization with pendulum appliances in the mixed dentition: effects on the position of unerupted canines and premolars.
    Kinzinger GS, Wehrbein H, Gross U, Diedrich PR.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):407-17. PubMed ID: 16527638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Clinical efficacy and influencing factors of molar distalization with clear aligner].
    Shi X, Mao J, Liu Y.
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Jul 09; 57(7):762-768. PubMed ID: 35844109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS, Patil RU, Reddy S, Prakash A, Kshetrimayum N, Shukla R.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016 Jul 09; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Skeletal versus conventional intraoral anchorage for the treatment of class II malocclusion: dentoalveolar and skeletal effects.
    Mariani L, Maino G, Caprioglio A.
    Prog Orthod; 2014 Jul 09; 15(1):43. PubMed ID: 25138818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.