These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


185 related items for PubMed ID: 34682417

  • 41. Some considerations on the challenges related to the use of the new ICNIRP restrictions for human exposure to radiofrequency fields.
    Goiceanu C, Danulescu R, Danulescu E.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2023 May 24; 199(8-9):818-825. PubMed ID: 37225206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Examples of occupational exposure to electric and magnetic fields at 110-kV gas-insulated substations (GISs).
    Korpinen L, Pääkkönen R.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Feb 24; 163(3):394-7. PubMed ID: 24966339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. [Assessment of the risk due to exposure to EMF with particular reference to the protection of sensitive subjects].
    Falsaperla R, Mattei E, Censi F, Bogi A, Pinto I, Calcagnini G.
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2019 Dec 24; 41(4):280-284. PubMed ID: 32126594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Health risk assessment of occupational exposure to a magnetic field from magnetic resonance imaging devices.
    Karpowicz J, Gryz K.
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2006 Dec 24; 12(2):155-67. PubMed ID: 16790173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Occupational exposure in MR facilities due to movements in the static magnetic field.
    Andreuccetti D, Biagi L, Burriesci G, Cannatà V, Contessa GM, Falsaperla R, Genovese E, Lodato R, Lopresto V, Merla C, Napolitano A, Pinto R, Tiberi G, Tosetti M, Zoppetti N.
    Med Phys; 2017 Nov 24; 44(11):5988-5996. PubMed ID: 28857189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. ASSESSMENT OF MOVEMENT-INDUCED TIME-VARYING MAGNETIC FIELDS EXPOSURE IN MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING BY A COMMERCIAL PORTABLE MAGNETOMETER.
    Filice S, Rossi R, Crisi G.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec 31; 185(3):326-330. PubMed ID: 30806458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Systematic Numerical Analysis of Magnetic Field Partial Body Exposure and Comparison With Occupational Exposure Limit Values According to European Directive 2013/35/EU.
    Hirtl R, Schmid G.
    Health Phys; 2017 Nov 31; 113(5):404-410. PubMed ID: 28961589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. dB/dt Evaluation in MRI Sites: Is ICNIRP Threshold Limit (for Workers) Exceeded?
    Acri G, Inferrera P, Denaro L, Sansotta C, Ruello E, Anfuso C, Salmeri FM, Garreffa G, Vermiglio G, Testagrossa B.
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Jun 21; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 29933587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Occupational exposure to base stations-compliance with EU directive 2004/40/EC.
    Gajsek P, Simunić D.
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2006 Jun 21; 12(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 16790176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. [Measurement and study report as a part of the control system for human safety and health protection against electromagnetic fields and electromagnetic radiation (0 Hz-300 GHz)].
    Aniołczyk H.
    Med Pr; 2007 Jun 21; 58(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 17926505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Measurements of occupational exposure to switched gradient and spatially-varying magnetic fields in areas adjacent to 1.5 T clinical MRI systems.
    Riches SF, Collins DJ, Charles-Edwards GD, Shafford JC, Cole J, Keevil SF, Leach MO.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov 21; 26(5):1346-52. PubMed ID: 17969176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. A survey of the potential impact of the European Union Physical Agents Directive (EU PAD) on electromagnetic fields (EMF) on MRI research practice in the United Kingdom.
    Perrin NM, Morris CJ.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Aug 21; 28(2):486-92. PubMed ID: 18666150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Evaluation of the Influence of Magnetic Field on Female Users of an Induction Hob in Ergonomically Sound Exposure Situations.
    Gryz K, Karpowicz J, Zradziński P.
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2020 Oct 21; 41(7):500-510. PubMed ID: 32726484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Aligning Exposure Limits for Contact Currents with Exposure Limits for Electric Fields.
    Kavet R, Tell RA.
    Health Phys; 2023 May 01; 124(5):351-371. PubMed ID: 36735538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. [Regulation requirements for the protection of workers against electromagnetic fields occurring in the work environment].
    Aniołczyk H, Zmyślony M.
    Med Pr; 2006 May 01; 57(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 16871960
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. MRI 'EXPOSIMETRY': HOW TO ANALYZE, COMPARE AND REPRESENT WORKER EXPOSURE TO STATIC MAGNETIC FIELD?
    Delmas A, Weber N, Piffre J, Pasquier C, Felblinger J, Vuissoz PA.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Dec 01; 177(4):415-423. PubMed ID: 28499015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.