These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

156 related items for PubMed ID: 3468247

  • 1. In vitro resistance of extensive amalgam restorations using various retention methods.
    Plasmans PJ, Kusters ST, de Jonge BA, van 't Hof MA, Vrijhoef MM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Jan; 57(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 3468247
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Pin vs. slot retention in extensive amalgam restorations.
    Outhwaite WC, Garman TA, Pashley DH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Apr; 41(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 284120
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Retention design for amalgam restorations: pins versus slots.
    Bailey JH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jan; 65(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 2033550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Retention and resistance features for complex amalgam restorations.
    Robbins JW, Burgess JO, Summitt JB.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 Apr; 118(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 2651502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A review of the amalgapin technique for complex amalgam restorations.
    Eberting JJ.
    Gen Dent; 2000 Apr; 48(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 11199563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [The extensive amalgam restoration and retention possibilities].
    Plasmans PJ, Vermeulen AH, de Jonge BA.
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1985 Nov; 92(11):439-43. PubMed ID: 3868739
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Large restorations with silver amalgam in molars and premolars].
    Garcia Vicente L, Garcia Barbero J.
    Rev Esp Estomatol; 1979 Nov; 27(3):145-62. PubMed ID: 296523
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Coronal reinforcement with cross-splinted pin-amalgam restorations.
    Lambert RL, Robinson FB, Lindemuth JS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Sep; 54(3):346-9. PubMed ID: 3864972
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparing the resistance of dentin bonding agents and pins in amalgam restorations.
    Imbery TA, Burgess JO, Batzer RC.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Jun; 126(6):753-9. PubMed ID: 7797731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of preparation design on the resistance for extensive amalgam restorations.
    Plasmans PJ, Kusters ST, Thissen AM, Van'T Hof MA, Vrijhoef MM.
    Oper Dent; 1987 Jun; 12(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 3473449
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Slots vs pins: a comparison of retention under simulated chewing stresses.
    Outhwaite WC, Twiggs SW, Fairhurst CW, King GE.
    J Dent Res; 1982 Feb; 61(2):400-2. PubMed ID: 6948858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Performance of a tooth with amalgam for support of cast pins].
    Hirata JM.
    Ars Curandi Odontol; 1977 Dec; 4(9):4-17. PubMed ID: 391200
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Optimized pin geometry for improved retention of parapulpal pins in amalgam].
    Neumeyer S, Gernet W, Bötsch H.
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Aug; 46(8):550-2. PubMed ID: 1817928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.