These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
156 related items for PubMed ID: 3468247
21. The retentive strength of slots with different width and depth versus pins. Chan CC, Chan KC. J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Nov; 58(5):552-7. PubMed ID: 3479552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Retention of amalgam restorations: undercuts versus bonding. Staninec M. Quintessence Int; 1989 May; 20(5):347-51. PubMed ID: 2667020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Mechanical resistance of extensive amalgam "restorations" anchored with the aid of threaded pins and amalgapins. Zangirolami NT, Steagall L, dos Santos Júnior J. Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1989 May; 3(1):289-93. PubMed ID: 2638492 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Amalgam restorations: a new approach. al-Duwairi Y, Hadj-Hamou R. J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Feb 28; 69(2):138-40. PubMed ID: 8429504 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Cavity preparations that extend the clinical longevity of amalgam restorations. Osborne JW, Summitt JB. J Ala Dent Assoc; 1993 Feb 28; 77(3):12-8. PubMed ID: 8188974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of axiopulpal line angle and proximal retention on fracture strength of amalgam restorations. Amorim A, de Lima Navarro MF, Mondelli J, Lopes ES. J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Aug 28; 40(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 278834 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Inlay cavity preparation for extensive restorations. Tanner AN. Br Dent J; 1970 Dec 01; 129(11):501-9. PubMed ID: 5275969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]