These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

319 related items for PubMed ID: 34719277

  • 1. The effect of cemented acetabular component geometry on the risk of revision for instability or loosening : a study of 224,874 primary hip arthroplasties from the National Joint Registry.
    Divecha HM, O'Neill TW, Lunt M, Board TN.
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Nov; 103-B(11):1669-1677. PubMed ID: 34719277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effect of uncemented acetabular liner geometry and lip size on the risk of revision for instability or loosening : a study on 202,511 primary hip arthroplasties from the National Joint Registry.
    Divecha HM, O'Neill TW, Lunt M, Board TN.
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Dec; 103-B(12):1774-1782. PubMed ID: 34847718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Using an asymmetric crosslinked polyethylene liner in primary total hip arthroplasty is associated with a lower risk of revision surgery : an analysis of the National Joint Registry.
    Davis ET, Pagkalos J, Kopjar B.
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Sep; 103-B(9):1479-1487. PubMed ID: 34465151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Do Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components Reduce the Risk of Rerevision After Revision THA Performed for Periprosthetic Joint Infection? A Study Using the NJR Data Set.
    Matharu GS, Judge A, Murray DW, Pandit HG.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jun; 477(6):1382-1389. PubMed ID: 31136438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Are Hooded, Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners Associated with a Reduced Risk of Revision After THA?
    Bauze A, Agrawal S, Cuthbert A, de Steiger R.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jun; 477(6):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 31136427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The design of the acetabular component and size of the femoral head influence the risk of revision following 34 721 single-brand cemented hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study of medium-term data from a National Joint Registry.
    Jameson SS, Baker PN, Mason J, Gregg PJ, Brewster N, Deehan DJ, Reed MR.
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Dec; 94(12):1611-7. PubMed ID: 23188900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Is there a problem with modular dual mobility acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty at mid-term follow-up?
    Hernandez NM, Hinton ZW, Wu CJ, Lachiewicz PF, Ryan SP, Wellman SS.
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jul; 103-B(7 Supple B):66-72. PubMed ID: 34192910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A comparison of cemented femoral fixation via anterior versus posterior approach total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 60,739 total hip arthroplasties.
    Hoskins W, Corfield S, Peng Y, Graves SE, Bingham R.
    Hip Int; 2024 Jul; 34(4):442-451. PubMed ID: 38529902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The Lawrence D. Dorr Surgical Techniques & Technologies Award: Why Are Contemporary Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties Failing? An Analysis of 2500 Cases.
    Goldman AH, Sierra RJ, Trousdale RT, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ, Abdel MP.
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S11-S16. PubMed ID: 30765230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Total hip arthroplasty revision by dual-mobility acetabular cup cemented in a metal reinforcement: A 62 case series at a minimum 5 years' follow-up.
    Lebeau N, Bayle M, Belhaouane R, Chelli M, Havet E, Brunschweiler B, Mertl P.
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):679-684. PubMed ID: 28578096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components Reduce the Risk of Revision Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score Matched Study From the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
    Matharu GS, Judge A, Murray DW, Pandit HG.
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):447-452. PubMed ID: 28947370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
    Gromov K, Pedersen AB, Overgaard S, Gebuhr P, Malchau H, Troelsen A.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].
    Kubinec V.
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018 Nov; 85(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 30257769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The fate of stable cemented acetabular components retained during revision of a femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty.
    Berger RA, Quigley LR, Jacobs JJ, Sheinkop MB, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1682-91. PubMed ID: 10608379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.