These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

99 related items for PubMed ID: 3473432

  • 1. [Reproducibility in bite-wing radiographs. A comparison of Eggen-Bite and Kwik-Bite].
    Møystad A, Larheim TA.
    Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1987 Feb; 97(2):41-4. PubMed ID: 3473432
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Reproducibility and overlapping of bitewing radiographs: comparison of Eggen-bite with Kwik-bite.
    Möystad A, Larheim TA.
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1989 Apr; 17(2):65-7. PubMed ID: 2920541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Survey of bite-wing entrance surface exposures for dental X-ray generators.
    Holloway AF, McFarlane DJ.
    Ont Dent; 1984 Feb; 61(2):23-6, 29. PubMed ID: 6591105
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [The quality of bite-wing radiographs in the full evaluation of various individual background variables].
    Naas S.
    Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid; 1986 Mar; 96(3):113-7. PubMed ID: 3462661
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Predictable intra-oral radiographs.
    Whaites EJ, Kidd EA, Dawson E.
    Dent Update; 1995 Mar; 22(6):230-6. PubMed ID: 8948168
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A modified bite wing X-ray technique for small children.
    Adams T.
    J Colo Dent Assoc; 1988 Apr; 66(5):9-10. PubMed ID: 3164000
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Classification and standards criteria for film holders in retro-alveolar radiography].
    Deverin JM.
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1986 Apr; 15(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 3460149
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Assessing the stability of parameters of equipment for dental radiography].
    Chikirdin EG, Zakharova VI.
    Med Tekh; 1997 Apr; (5):3-4. PubMed ID: 9445977
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Film factors relevant to color reproduction requirements for use in the dental office.
    Goldenberg AS.
    Compendium; 1993 Nov; 14(11):1428, 1430, 1432 passim. PubMed ID: 8620379
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A survey of all dental x-ray machines in British Columbia using TLD chips 1981-83.
    Morley DR, Greene MW, McConchie JM, Gray AS.
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1985 Sep; 51(9):683-7. PubMed ID: 3902173
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Oblique radiographs.
    Greenwood GA.
    Br Dent J; 2009 Mar 28; 206(6):300. PubMed ID: 19329951
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Use of filmholders to obtain reproducible bite-wing films for the diagnosis of caries].
    Kirkegaard E, Sewerin I.
    Tandlaegebladet; 1982 May 28; 86(9):297-302. PubMed ID: 6960536
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.