These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. [Clinical evaluation of old amalgam restorations]. Sougiouklakis G, Patelarou N, Doubitsas G, Mountouris G. Odontostomatol Proodos; 1982 Dec 22; 36(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 6820132 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. EFFECT OF PRECONDENSATION MERCURY CONTENT ON THE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF AMALGAM. MAHLER DB, MITCHEM JC. J Am Dent Assoc; 1965 Sep 22; 71():593-600. PubMed ID: 14327164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Metallographic studies of the junction between 2 parts of an amalgam restoration placed at different times]. Rode M. Zobozdrav Vestn; 1986 Sep 22; 41(3-4):86-8. PubMed ID: 3468698 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Gallium: an alternative for amalgam?]. Schuurs AH, Davidson CL. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1997 Apr 22; 104(4):142-5. PubMed ID: 11924385 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of condensers on adaptability and microporosity of amalgam restorations. Coradazzi JL, Hadavi F, Asgar K. J Pedod; 1983 Apr 22; 8(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 6584582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. PIN RETENTION AMALGAM RESTORATIONS. WING G. Aust Dent J; 1965 Feb 22; 10(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 14274161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Replica studies of the dimensional variations of amalgam in vivo]. Dorigo E, Castronovo G. G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1983 Feb 22; 2(3):41-3. PubMed ID: 6590486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Problems with amalgam: physical and chemical instability. Davis M. Dent Today; 2000 Jul 22; 19(7):94-6, 98-101. PubMed ID: 12524826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Aspects of amalgam margins. An in vitro study]. Schultz BA. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1980 Mar 22; 87(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 6934392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Evaluation of manually and mechanically processed amalgam]. Strestíkova H, Hubácková J, Hornová J. Cesk Stomatol; 1983 Oct 22; 83(5):322-5. PubMed ID: 6378405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical handling characteristics of spherical amalgam. Baker DL, Greasley A. Br Dent J; 1978 Jun 20; 144(12):377-83. PubMed ID: 277197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Foresight is better than hindsight--also in amalgam manipulation]. Spengler HJ, Johansson B. Quintessenz J; 1981 Apr 20; 11(4):365-75. PubMed ID: 6952461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The wear of dental amalgam in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. DeLong R, Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, Pintado MR. Dent Mater; 1985 Dec 20; 1(6):238-42. PubMed ID: 3868634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Failure of the amalgam fillings. When and why]. Douvitsas GP. Odontostomatol Proodos; 1982 Dec 20; 36(5):219-24. PubMed ID: 6820969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Impact of the marginal border on the longevity of silver amalgam restorations]. Seguin C, Gras N. Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1978 Dec 20; 7(5):331-8. PubMed ID: 283478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Microstructures of Cu-rich amalgam restorations with moderate clinical deterioration. Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, Letzel H, Vrijhoef MM. Dent Mater; 1987 Jun 20; 3(3):135-43. PubMed ID: 3481587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The new generation amalgam alloys. Clinical considerations. Jordan RE, Suzuki M, Boksman L. Dent Clin North Am; 1985 Apr 20; 29(2):341-58. PubMed ID: 3858165 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Dental amalgams. Vaidyanathan TK, Sumithra N. N Y State Dent J; 1983 Oct 20; 49(8):565-7. PubMed ID: 6579446 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]