These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
184 related items for PubMed ID: 3477949
21. Effect of protraction headgear on Class III malocclusion. Ngan P, Wei SH, Hagg U, Yiu CK, Merwin D, Stickel B. Quintessence Int; 1992 Mar; 23(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 1641462 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Application of a maxillary forward-traction device in skeletal Class III malocclusion]. Miki Y, Kuroda Y, Tokizane C, Shimizu T, Ikoma Y, Susami R. Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Mar; 44(1):144-59. PubMed ID: 3859557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Craniofacial morphology of skeletal class III patients before treatment and growth-related changes during treatment with a maxillary protraction appliance: a comparison of orthodontic and surgical cases. Murakami C, Hiyama S, Ohyama K. World J Orthod; 2005 Mar; 6(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 15794042 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion. Cozza P, Baccetti T, Mucedero M, Pavoni C, Franchi L. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial. Liu W, Zhou Y, Wang X, Liu D, Zhou S. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct; 148(4):641-51. PubMed ID: 26432320 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents. Chen L, Chen R, Yang Y, Ji G, Shen G. Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Three-phase treatment concept for skeletal Class III growing patients with severe space deficiency: A report of three cases with skeletally anchored maxillary protraction. Lin HY, Yang H, Lai EH, Lin SY, Chang JZ. J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Apr; 119(4):869-878. PubMed ID: 31331705 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Vertical control as an important ingredient in the treatment of severe sagittal discrepancies. Fotis V, Melsen B, Williams S, Droschl H. Am J Orthod; 1984 Sep; 86(3):224-32. PubMed ID: 6591802 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Treatment effects of occipitomental anchorage appliance of maxillary protraction combined with chincup traction in children with Class III malocclusion. Lin HC, Chang HP, Chang HF. J Formos Med Assoc; 2007 May; 106(5):380-91. PubMed ID: 17561473 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Dentoskeletal comparison of miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction with hybrid and conventional hyrax expanders: A randomized clinical trial. Miranda F, Cunha Bastos JCD, Magno Dos Santos A, Janson G, Pereira Lauris JR, Garib D. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Dec; 160(6):774-783. PubMed ID: 34509329 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia. Sar C, Sahinoğlu Z, Özçirpici AA, Uçkan S. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The efficacy of maxillary protraction protocols with the micro-implant-assisted rapid palatal expander (MARPE) and the novel N2 mini-implant-a finite element study. Moon W, Wu KW, MacGinnis M, Sung J, Chu H, Youssef G, Machado A. Prog Orthod; 2015 Jan; 16():16. PubMed ID: 26061987 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of onplants as stable anchorage for facemask treatment: a case report. Hong H, Ngan P, Han G, Qi LG, Wei SH. Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):453-60. PubMed ID: 15898388 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Cephalometric and occlusal changes following maxillary expansion and protraction. Ngan P, Yiu C, Hu A, Hägg U, Wei SH, Gunel E. Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):237-54. PubMed ID: 9699402 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Early treatment of Class III malocclusion by maxillary protraction facial mask: effects on craniofacial structures and upper airway dimensions]. Dakhlaoui H, Ben El Kahla R, Gmati H, Nasfi M, El Yemni Zinelabidine A. Orthod Fr; 2020 Oct 01; 91(3):239-248. PubMed ID: 33146618 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Skeletal response to maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate before age 10 years. Tindlund RS. Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1994 Jul 01; 31(4):295-308. PubMed ID: 7918525 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Long-term evaluation after chincap treatment. Uner O, Yüksel S, Uçüncü N. Eur J Orthod; 1995 Apr 01; 17(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 7781722 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of the modified maxillary protractor applied to Class III malocclusion with retruded maxilla in early mixed dentition. Kajiyama K, Murakami T, Suzuki A. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov 01; 118(5):549-59. PubMed ID: 11094369 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction in patients exhibiting skeletal class III malocclusion: a comparison of three skeletal maturation groups. Cha KS. Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb 01; 73(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 12607852 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Long-term effects of chincap therapy on skeletal profile in mandibular prognathism. Sugawara J, Asano T, Endo N, Mitani H. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug 01; 98(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 2378318 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]