These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

452 related items for PubMed ID: 34792273

  • 1. First in-human evaluation of a novel intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography system for intracoronary imaging.
    Akl E, Pinilla-Echeverri N, Garcia-Garcia HM, Mehta SR, Dan K, Kuku KO, Courtney BK, Sheth T.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Feb; 99(3):686-698. PubMed ID: 34792273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
    Maehara A, Ben-Yehuda O, Ali Z, Wijns W, Bezerra HG, Shite J, Généreux P, Nichols M, Jenkins P, Witzenbichler B, Mintz GS, Stone GW.
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Fujino Y, Bezerra HG, Attizzani GF, Wang W, Yamamoto H, Chamié D, Kanaya T, Mehanna E, Tahara S, Nakamura S, Costa MA.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep 01; 82(3):E173-83. PubMed ID: 23359350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.
    Ali ZA, Maehara A, Généreux P, Shlofmitz RA, Fabbiocchi F, Nazif TM, Guagliumi G, Meraj PM, Alfonso F, Samady H, Akasaka T, Carlson EB, Leesar MA, Matsumura M, Ozan MO, Mintz GS, Ben-Yehuda O, Stone GW, ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI Investigators.
    Lancet; 2016 Nov 26; 388(10060):2618-2628. PubMed ID: 27806900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of observer variability and reliability in the assessment of stent deployment: the OCTIVUS study.
    Magnus PC, Jayne JE, Garcia-Garcia HM, Swart M, van Es GA, Tijssen J, Kaplan AV.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug 26; 86(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25620044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Optical Frequency Domain Imaging Versus Intravascular Ultrasound in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (OPINION Trial): Results From the OPINION Imaging Study.
    Otake H, Kubo T, Takahashi H, Shinke T, Okamura T, Hibi K, Nakazawa G, Morino Y, Shite J, Fusazaki T, Kozuma K, Ioji T, Kaneda H, Akasaka T, OPINION Investigators.
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan 26; 11(1):111-123. PubMed ID: 28917678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Usefulness of Frequency Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Compared with Intravascular Ultrasound as a Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Kim IC, Yoon HJ, Shin ES, Kim MS, Park J, Cho YK, Park HS, Kim H, Nam CW, Han SW, Kim YN, Kim KB, Hur SH.
    J Interv Cardiol; 2016 Apr 26; 29(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 26927366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes Between Intravascular Ultrasound-, Optical Coherence Tomography- and Angiography-Guided Stent Implantation: A Meta-Analysis.
    Şaylık F, Hayıroglu Mİ, Akbulut T, Çınar T.
    Angiology; 2024 Oct 26; 75(9):809-819. PubMed ID: 37644871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Intravascular imaging-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Amin AM, Khlidj Y, Abuelazm M, Sayed A, Khan U, Elewidi MM, Tanashat M, Elharti H, Ellabban MH, Alassiri AK, Alsaed M, Abdelazeem B, Kawsara A.
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2024 Sep 11; 24(1):483. PubMed ID: 39261775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Impact of IVUS and OCT on physician decision-making during post-PCI optimization.
    Bhogal S, Hashim H, Merdler I, Aladin AI, Zhang C, Ben-Dor I, Garcia-Garcia HM, Mintz GS, Waksman R.
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2023 Oct 11; 55():96-98. PubMed ID: 37394321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison Between Optical Frequency Domain Imaging and Intravascular Ultrasound for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guidance in Biolimus A9-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Randomized MISTIC-1 Non-Inferiority Trial.
    Muramatsu T, Ozaki Y, Nanasato M, Ishikawa M, Nagasaka R, Ohota M, Hashimoto Y, Yoshiki Y, Takatsu H, Ito K, Kamiya H, Yoshida Y, Murohara T, Izawa H, MISTIC-1 Investigators.
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov 11; 13(11):e009314. PubMed ID: 33106049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. IVUS-Guided Versus OCT-Guided Coronary Stent Implantation: A Critical Appraisal.
    Maehara A, Matsumura M, Ali ZA, Mintz GS, Stone GW.
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Dec 11; 10(12):1487-1503. PubMed ID: 29216976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Bezerra HG, Attizzani GF, Sirbu V, Musumeci G, Lortkipanidze N, Fujino Y, Wang W, Nakamura S, Erglis A, Guagliumi G, Costa MA.
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar 11; 6(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 23517833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. In Vivo Calcium Detection by Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Angiography.
    Wang X, Matsumura M, Mintz GS, Lee T, Zhang W, Cao Y, Fujino A, Lin Y, Usui E, Kanaji Y, Murai T, Yonetsu T, Kakuta T, Maehara A.
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Aug 11; 10(8):869-879. PubMed ID: 28797408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Multi-modality imaging for stent edge assessment.
    Ann SH, Lim KH, De Jin C, Shin ES.
    Heart Vessels; 2015 Mar 11; 30(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 24481539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Interstudy reproducibility of the second generation, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in patients with coronary artery disease and comparison with intravascular ultrasound: a study applying automated contour detection.
    Jamil Z, Tearney G, Bruining N, Sihan K, van Soest G, Ligthart J, van Domburg R, Bouma B, Regar E.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan 11; 29(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 22639296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Reciprocal assistance of intravascular imaging in three-dimensional stent reconstruction: Using cross-modal translation based on disentanglement representation.
    Wu P, Qiao Y, Chu M, Zhang S, Bai J, Gutierrez-Chico JL, Tu S.
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2023 Mar 11; 104():102166. PubMed ID: 36586195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Variability in quantitative and qualitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound and frequency domain optical coherence tomography.
    Abnousi F, Waseda K, Kume T, Otake H, Kawarada O, Yong CM, Fitzgerald PJ, Honda Y, Yeung AC, Fearon WF.
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep 01; 82(3):E192-9. PubMed ID: 23412754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Guiding Intervention for Complex Coronary Lesions by Optical Coherence Tomography or Intravascular Ultrasound.
    Kang DY, Ahn JM, Yun SC, Hur SH, Cho YK, Lee CH, Hong SJ, Lim S, Kim SW, Won H, Oh JH, Choe JC, Hong YJ, Yoon YH, Kim H, Choi Y, Lee J, Yoon YW, Kim SJ, Bae JH, Park SJ, Park DW, OCTIVUS Investigators.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2024 Jan 23; 83(3):401-413. PubMed ID: 37879490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.