These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


328 related items for PubMed ID: 34797926

  • 1. Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small- and large-for-gestational age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population-based study.
    Monier I, Ego A, Benachi A, Hocquette A, Blondel B, Goffinet F, Zeitlin J.
    BJOG; 2022 May; 129(6):938-948. PubMed ID: 34797926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparing population-based fetal growth standards in a US cohort.
    Gleason JL, Reddy UM, Chen Z, Grobman WA, Wapner RJ, Steller JG, Simhan H, Scifres CM, Blue N, Parry S, Grantz KL.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Sep; 231(3):338.e1-338.e18. PubMed ID: 38151220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Performance of six birth-weight and estimated-fetal-weight standards for predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a 10-year nationwide population-based study.
    Choi SKY, Gordon A, Hilder L, Henry A, Hyett JA, Brew BK, Joseph F, Jorm L, Chambers GM.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 58(2):264-277. PubMed ID: 32672406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.
    Kabiri D, Romero R, Gudicha DW, Hernandez-Andrade E, Pacora P, Benshalom-Tirosh N, Tirosh D, Yeo L, Erez O, Hassan SS, Tarca AL.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):177-188. PubMed ID: 31006913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparing the Hadlock fetal growth standard to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development racial/ethnic standard for the prediction of neonatal morbidity and small for gestational age.
    Blue NR, Beddow ME, Savabi M, Katukuri VR, Chao CR.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):474.e1-474.e12. PubMed ID: 30118689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Prediction of large-for-gestational-age infant by fetal growth charts and hemoglobin A1c level in pregnancy complicated by pregestational diabetes.
    Kiefer MK, Finneran MM, Ware CA, Foy P, Thung SF, Gabbe SG, Landon MB, Grobman WA, Venkatesh KK.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Dec; 60(6):751-758. PubMed ID: 36099480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates.
    Ciobanu A, Khan N, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 53(6):761-768. PubMed ID: 30883981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Single and Serial Fetal Biometry to Detect Preterm and Term Small- and Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.
    Tarca AL, Hernandez-Andrade E, Ahn H, Garcia M, Xu Z, Korzeniewski SJ, Saker H, Chaiworapongsa T, Hassan SS, Yeo L, Romero R.
    PLoS One; 2016 Jun; 11(11):e0164161. PubMed ID: 27802270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Third trimester ultrasound estimated fetal weight for increasing prenatal prediction of small-for-gestational age newborns in low-risk pregnant women.
    Martín-Palumbo G, Atanasova VB, Rego Tejeda MT, Antolín Alvarado E, Bartha JL.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):6721-6726. PubMed ID: 34024243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. World Health Organization fetal growth charts applied in a French birth cohort.
    Hocquette A, Zeitlin J, Heude B, Ego A, Charles MA, Monier I.
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar; 51(3):102308. PubMed ID: 34998974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Testing the assumptions of customized intrauterine growth charts using national birth studies.
    Hocquette A, Monier I, Blondel B, Dufourg MN, Heude B, Zeitlin J.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Apr; 101(4):405-416. PubMed ID: 35224718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Performance of different fetal growth charts in prediction of large-for-gestational age and associated neonatal morbidity in multiethnic obese population.
    Verger C, Moraitis AA, Barnfield L, Sovio U, Bamfo JEAK.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jul; 56(1):73-77. PubMed ID: 31364195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparing fetal biometric growth velocity versus estimated fetal weight for prediction of neonatal small for gestational age.
    Price CR, Roeckner J, Odibo L, Odibo A.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Oct; 35(20):3931-3936. PubMed ID: 33172312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.