These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

101 related items for PubMed ID: 3480492

  • 1. An evaluation of xeroradiographs and radiographs in length determination in endodontics.
    Barkhordar RA, Nicholson RJ, Nguyen NT, Abbasi J.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Dec; 64(6):747-50. PubMed ID: 3480492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Use of xeroradiography for length determination in endodontics.
    San Marco PA, Montgomery S.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Mar; 57(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 6584820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparison between xeroradiographs and conventional radiographs as an aid in root canal therapy for maxillary molars.
    Alexander JB, Andrews JD.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Apr; 67(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 2726205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A comparison of Kodak Ultraspeed and Ektaspeed Plus dental X-ray films for use in endodontics.
    Moule AJ, Wong A, Monsour PA, Basford KE.
    Aust Dent J; 2001 Jun; 46(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 11491237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Radiographic interpretation of endodontic file length.
    Cox VS, Brown CE, Bricker SL, Newton CW.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Sep; 72(3):340-4. PubMed ID: 1923424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of radiographic and electronic working lengths.
    Pratten DH, McDonald NJ.
    J Endod; 1996 Apr; 22(4):173-6. PubMed ID: 8935014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. An evaluation of Ektaspeed Plus film versus Ultraspeed film for endodontic working length determination.
    Brown R, Hadley JN, Chambers DW.
    J Endod; 1998 Jan; 24(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 9487870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The electronic determination of working length.
    McDonald NJ.
    Dent Clin North Am; 1992 Apr; 36(2):293-307. PubMed ID: 1572500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Determination of root length in endodontic procedures].
    Jorgensen MH.
    Tandlaegebladet; 1971 Nov; 75(11):1080-2. PubMed ID: 5288222
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Interpretation of endodontic file lengths using RadioVisiography.
    Leddy BJ, Miles DA, Newton CW, Brown CE.
    J Endod; 1994 Nov; 20(11):542-5. PubMed ID: 7643038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of radiovisiography with radiographic film in root length determination.
    Ong EY, Pitt Ford TR.
    Int Endod J; 1995 Jan; 28(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 7642325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cone-beam computed tomographic scans in comparison with periapical radiographs for root canal length measurement: an in situ study.
    Metska ME, Liem VM, Parsa A, Koolstra JH, Wesselink PR, Ozok AR.
    J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1206-9. PubMed ID: 25069934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.