These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
185 related items for PubMed ID: 34852617
41. Release from informational masking in a monaural competing-speech task with vocoded copies of the maskers presented contralaterally. Bernstein JG, Iyer N, Brungart DS. J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):702-13. PubMed ID: 25698005 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Effects of type of early reflection, clarity of speech, reverberation and diffuse noise on the spatial perception of a speech source and its intelligibility. Prodi N, Pellegatti M, Visentin C. J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 May; 151(5):3522. PubMed ID: 35649908 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Adaptation to Reverberation for Speech Perception: A Systematic Review. Tsironis A, Vlahou E, Kontou P, Bagos P, Kopčo N. Trends Hear; 2024 May; 28():23312165241273399. PubMed ID: 39246212 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants. Xu K, Willis S, Gopen Q, Fu QJ. Ear Hear; 2020 May; 41(5):1362-1371. PubMed ID: 32132377 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Modeling the effects of a single reflection on binaural speech intelligibility. Rennies J, Warzybok A, Brand T, Kollmeier B. J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1556-67. PubMed ID: 24606290 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The multiple contributions of interaural differences to improved speech intelligibility in multitalker scenarios. Schoenmaker E, Brand T, van de Par S. J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2589. PubMed ID: 27250153 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Spatial release from masking in children with bilateral cochlear implants and with normal hearing: Effect of target-interferer similarity. Misurelli SM, Litovsky RY. J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):319-31. PubMed ID: 26233032 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Redundant Information Is Sometimes More Beneficial Than Spatial Information to Understand Speech in Noise. Dieudonné B, Francart T. Ear Hear; 2019 Jul; 40(3):545-554. PubMed ID: 30299342 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The combined effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners. Hazrati O, Loizou PC. Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 51(6):437-43. PubMed ID: 22356300 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Spatial release from energetic and informational masking in a selective speech identification task. Ihlefeld A, Shinn-Cunningham B. J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4369-79. PubMed ID: 18537388 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Evaluating the benefit of hearing aids in solving the cocktail party problem. Marrone N, Mason CR, Kidd G. Trends Amplif; 2008 Dec; 12(4):300-15. PubMed ID: 19010794 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Payton KL, Uchanski RM, Braida LD. J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1581-92. PubMed ID: 8176061 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Effects of better-ear glimpsing, binaural unmasking, and spectral resolution on spatial release from masking in cochlear-implant users. Gibbs BE, Bernstein JGW, Brungart DS, Goupell MJ. J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Aug; 152(2):1230. PubMed ID: 36050186 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Release from perceptual masking for children and adults: benefit of a carrier phrase. Bonino AY, Leibold LJ, Buss E. Ear Hear; 2013 Aug; 34(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 22836239 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]