These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

184 related items for PubMed ID: 34863518

  • 1. Toward more accurate prediction of future pregnancy outcome in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss: taking both partners into account.
    du Fossé NA, van der Hoorn MP, de Koning R, Mulders AGMGJ, van Lith JMM, le Cessie S, Lashley EELO.
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Jan; 117(1):144-152. PubMed ID: 34863518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. External validation of a frequently used prediction model for ongoing pregnancy in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Youssef A, van der Hoorn MLP, Dongen M, Visser J, Bloemenkamp K, van Lith J, van Geloven N, Lashley EELO.
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar 01; 37(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 34875054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluating the role of paternal factors in aetiology and prognosis of recurrent pregnancy loss: study protocol for a hospital-based multicentre case-control study and cohort study (REMI III project).
    du Fossé N, van der Hoorn ML, Eikmans M, Heidt S, le Cessie S, Mulders A, van Lith J, Lashley E.
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov 14; 9(11):e033095. PubMed ID: 31727666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effect of paternal and maternal factors on the prognosis of live birth in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Peuranpää PL, Gissler M, Peltopuro P, Tiitinen A, Hautamäki H.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Dec 14; 101(12):1374-1385. PubMed ID: 36210542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A nomogram and risk stratification to predict subsequent pregnancy loss in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Li M, Zhou R, Yu D, Chen D, Zhao A.
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Oct 01; 39(10):2221-2232. PubMed ID: 39178353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization frozen embryo transfer (IVF-FET) with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL): a SART-CORS study.
    Bhatt SJ, Marchetto NM, Roy J, Morelli SS, McGovern PG.
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Jul 19; 36(8):2339-2344. PubMed ID: 34027546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Can we distinguish between infertility and subfertility when predicting natural conception in couples with an unfulfilled child wish?
    Van Geloven N, Van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM, Hompes PG, Zwinderman AH, Mol BW.
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Mar 19; 28(3):658-65. PubMed ID: 23250923
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Recurrent pregnancy losses and gestational age are closely related: an observational cohort study on 759 pregnancy losses.
    Coccia ME, Rizzello F, Capezzuoli T, Spitaleri M, Riviello C.
    Reprod Sci; 2015 May 19; 22(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 25305129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Predicting the chances of having a baby with or without treatment at different time points in couples with unexplained subfertility.
    McLernon DJ, Lee AJ, Maheshwari A, van Eekelen R, van Geloven N, Putter H, Eijkemans MJ, van der Steeg JW, van der Veen F, Steyerberg EW, Mol BW, Bhattacharya S.
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun 04; 34(6):1126-1138. PubMed ID: 31119290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Defining recurrent pregnancy loss: associated factors and prognosis in couples with two versus three or more pregnancy losses.
    Youssef A, Lashley L, Dieben S, Verburg H, van der Hoorn ML.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Oct 04; 41(4):679-685. PubMed ID: 32811769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation combined with 24-chromosome microarray of miscarriage tissue provides a probable or definite cause of pregnancy loss in over 90% of patients.
    Popescu F, Jaslow CR, Kutteh WH.
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Apr 01; 33(4):579-587. PubMed ID: 29538673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. DNA methylation defects in spermatozoa of male partners from couples experiencing recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Khambata K, Raut S, Deshpande S, Mohan S, Sonawane S, Gaonkar R, Ansari Z, Datar M, Bansal V, Patil A, Warke H, Balasinor NH.
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Jan 01; 36(1):48-60. PubMed ID: 33319906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Systematic review of subsequent pregnancy outcomes in couples with parental abnormal chromosomal karyotypes and recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Li S, Zheng PS, Ma HM, Feng Q, Zhang YR, Li QS, He JJ, Liu WF.
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Nov 01; 118(5):906-914. PubMed ID: 36175209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of infertility, maternal age, and number of previous miscarriages on the outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Garrisi JG, Colls P, Ferry KM, Zheng X, Garrisi MG, Munné S.
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jul 01; 92(1):288-95. PubMed ID: 18692844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A new prognostic model for recurrent pregnancy loss: assessment of thyroid and thromboelastograph parameters.
    Mu F, Huo H, Wang C, Hu N, Wang F.
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2024 Jul 01; 15():1415786. PubMed ID: 38883610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Natural procreative technology for infertility and recurrent miscarriage: outcomes in a Canadian family practice.
    Tham E, Schliep K, Stanford J.
    Can Fam Physician; 2012 May 01; 58(5):e267-74. PubMed ID: 22734170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Predictors of pregnancy and live-birth in couples with unexplained infertility after ovarian stimulation-intrauterine insemination.
    Hansen KR, He AL, Styer AK, Wild RA, Butts S, Engmann L, Diamond MP, Legro RS, Coutifaris C, Alvero R, Robinson RD, Casson P, Christman GM, Huang H, Santoro N, Eisenberg E, Zhang H, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Reproductive Medicine Network.
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Jun 01; 105(6):1575-1583.e2. PubMed ID: 26949110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Diminished ovarian reserve in recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bunnewell SJ, Honess ER, Karia AM, Keay SD, Al Wattar BH, Quenby S.
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Apr 01; 113(4):818-827.e3. PubMed ID: 32145928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Development of the OPAL prediction model for prediction of live birth in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss: protocol for a prospective and retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands.
    Youssef A, van der Hoorn ML, van Eekelen R, van Geloven N, van Wely M, Smits MAJ, Mulders A, van Lith JM, Goddijn M, Lashley E.
    BMJ Open; 2022 Sep 23; 12(9):e062402. PubMed ID: 36153018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss due to embryonic aneuploidy or recurrent implantation failure.
    Sato T, Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozawa F, Yamamoto T, Kato T, Kurahashi H, Kuroda T, Aoyama N, Kato K, Kobayashi R, Fukuda A, Utsunomiya T, Kuwahara A, Saito H, Takeshita T, Irahara M.
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Dec 01; 34(12):2340-2348. PubMed ID: 31811307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.