These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

138 related items for PubMed ID: 34869760

  • 1. Image Quality Evaluation of a Digital Radiography System Made in Thailand.
    Techavipoo U, Sinsuebphon N, Prompalit S, Thongvigitmanee S, Narkbuakaew W, Kiang-Ia A, Srivongsa T, Thajchayapong P, Chaumrattanakul U.
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():3102673. PubMed ID: 34869760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
    Sandborg M, Tingberg A, Ullman G, Dance DR, Alm Carlsson G.
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
    Alsleem H, U P, Mong KS, Davidson R.
    Radiol Technol; 2014 Nov; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
    Tingberg A, Sjöström D.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Nov; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Correlation of the clinical and physical image quality in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.
    Moore CS, Wood TJ, Beavis AW, Saunderson JR.
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 86(1027):20130077. PubMed ID: 23568362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Low contrast detectability and spatial resolution with model-based Iterative reconstructions of MDCT images: a phantom and cadaveric study.
    Millon D, Vlassenbroek A, Van Maanen AG, Cambier SE, Coche EE.
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):927-937. PubMed ID: 27300195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Automatic quantitative low contrast analysis of digital chest phantom radiographs.
    Kwan AL, Filipow LJ, Le LH.
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 12674230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Patient radiation exposure and image quality evaluation with the use of iDose4 iterative reconstruction algorithm in chest-abdomen-pelvis CT examinations.
    Ploussi A, Alexopoulou E, Economopoulos N, Argentos SI, Tsitsia V, Arapakis I, Kordolaimi S, Seimenis I, Efstathopoulos EP.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Mar; 158(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 24107575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A method to optimize the processing algorithm of a computed radiography system for chest radiography.
    Moore CS, Liney GP, Beavis AW, Saunderson JR.
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Sep; 80(957):724-30. PubMed ID: 17709364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A dual-view digital tomosynthesis imaging technique for improved chest imaging.
    Zhong Y, Lai CJ, Wang T, Shaw CC.
    Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5238-51. PubMed ID: 26328973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.