These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

275 related items for PubMed ID: 34875054

  • 1. External validation of a frequently used prediction model for ongoing pregnancy in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Youssef A, van der Hoorn MLP, Dongen M, Visser J, Bloemenkamp K, van Lith J, van Geloven N, Lashley EELO.
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar 01; 37(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 34875054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A nomogram and risk stratification to predict subsequent pregnancy loss in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Li M, Zhou R, Yu D, Chen D, Zhao A.
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Oct 01; 39(10):2221-2232. PubMed ID: 39178353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization frozen embryo transfer (IVF-FET) with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL): a SART-CORS study.
    Bhatt SJ, Marchetto NM, Roy J, Morelli SS, McGovern PG.
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Jul 19; 36(8):2339-2344. PubMed ID: 34027546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Recurrent pregnancy loss: what is the impact of consecutive versus non-consecutive losses?
    Egerup P, Kolte AM, Larsen EC, Krog M, Nielsen HS, Christiansen OB.
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov 19; 31(11):2428-2434. PubMed ID: 27591241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation combined with 24-chromosome microarray of miscarriage tissue provides a probable or definite cause of pregnancy loss in over 90% of patients.
    Popescu F, Jaslow CR, Kutteh WH.
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Apr 01; 33(4):579-587. PubMed ID: 29538673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Toward more accurate prediction of future pregnancy outcome in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss: taking both partners into account.
    du Fossé NA, van der Hoorn MP, de Koning R, Mulders AGMGJ, van Lith JMM, le Cessie S, Lashley EELO.
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Jan 01; 117(1):144-152. PubMed ID: 34863518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Predicting the cumulative chance of live birth over multiple complete cycles of in vitro fertilization: an external validation study.
    Leijdekkers JA, Eijkemans MJC, van Tilborg TC, Oudshoorn SC, McLernon DJ, Bhattacharya S, Mol BWJ, Broekmans FJM, Torrance HL, OPTIMIST group.
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Sep 01; 33(9):1684-1695. PubMed ID: 30085143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss due to embryonic aneuploidy or recurrent implantation failure.
    Sato T, Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozawa F, Yamamoto T, Kato T, Kurahashi H, Kuroda T, Aoyama N, Kato K, Kobayashi R, Fukuda A, Utsunomiya T, Kuwahara A, Saito H, Takeshita T, Irahara M.
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Dec 01; 34(12):2340-2348. PubMed ID: 31811307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Hydroxychloroquine in recurrent pregnancy loss: data from a French prospective multicenter registry.
    Dernoncourt A, Hedhli K, Abisror N, Cheloufi M, Cohen J, Kolanska K, McAvoy C, Selleret L, Ballot E, Mathieu d'Argent E, Chabbert Buffet N, Fain O, Kayem G, Mekinian A.
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Sep 01; 39(9):1934-1941. PubMed ID: 38942601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Prevalence, causes, and impact of non-visualized pregnancy losses in a recurrent pregnancy loss population.
    Bedaiwy MA, Fayek B, Yang EC, Iews MS, Elgendi M, Abdelkareem AO, Abdellah AH, Liu YD, Jones A, Mayer U, Abdel Hafez FF.
    Hum Reprod; 2023 May 02; 38(5):830-839. PubMed ID: 36881694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Non-visualized pregnancy losses are prognostically important for unexplained recurrent miscarriage.
    Kolte AM, van Oppenraaij RH, Quenby S, Farquharson RG, Stephenson M, Goddijn M, Christiansen OB, ESHRE Special Interest Group Early Pregnancy.
    Hum Reprod; 2014 May 02; 29(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 24603132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The importance of the 'uterine factor' in recurrent pregnancy loss: a retrospective cohort study on women screened through 3D transvaginal ultrasound.
    Busnelli A, Barbaro G, Pozzati F, D'Ippolito S, Cristodoro M, Nobili E, Scambia G, Di Simone N.
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Aug 01; 39(8):1645-1655. PubMed ID: 38964365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. External validation of a dynamic prediction model for repeated predictions of natural conception over time.
    van Eekelen R, McLernon DJ, van Wely M, Eijkemans MJ, Bhattacharya S, van der Veen F, van Geloven N.
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Dec 01; 33(12):2268-2275. PubMed ID: 30358841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Recurrent pregnancy loss: couples' perspectives on their need for treatment, support and follow up.
    Koert E, Malling GMH, Sylvest R, Krog MC, Kolte AM, Schmidt L, Nielsen HS.
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Feb 01; 34(2):291-296. PubMed ID: 30561641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss: an update in 2022.
    ESHRE Guideline Group on RPL, Bender Atik R, Christiansen OB, Elson J, Kolte AM, Lewis S, Middeldorp S, Mcheik S, Peramo B, Quenby S, Nielsen HS, van der Hoorn ML, Vermeulen N, Goddijn M.
    Hum Reprod Open; 2023 Feb 01; 2023(1):hoad002. PubMed ID: 36873081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A history of recurrent pregnancy loss is associated with increased perinatal complications, but not necessarily a longer birth interval: a population study spanning 18 years.
    Cho K, Fayek B, Liu YD, Albert A, Wiesenthal E, Dobrer S, AbdelHafez FF, Lisonkova S, Bedaiwy MA.
    Hum Reprod; 2024 May 02; 39(5):1105-1116. PubMed ID: 38390658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluating the role of paternal factors in aetiology and prognosis of recurrent pregnancy loss: study protocol for a hospital-based multicentre case-control study and cohort study (REMI III project).
    du Fossé N, van der Hoorn ML, Eikmans M, Heidt S, le Cessie S, Mulders A, van Lith J, Lashley E.
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov 14; 9(11):e033095. PubMed ID: 31727666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Natural conception: repeated predictions over time.
    van Eekelen R, Scholten I, Tjon-Kon-Fat RI, van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Hompes P, van Wely M, van der Veen F, Mol BW, Eijkemans MJ, Te Velde ER, van Geloven N.
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb 14; 32(2):346-353. PubMed ID: 27993999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Time to conception and time to live birth in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage.
    Kaandorp SP, van Mens TE, Middeldorp S, Hutten BA, Hof MH, van der Post JA, van der Veen F, Goddijn M.
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun 14; 29(6):1146-52. PubMed ID: 24682612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Prediction model for clinical pregnancy for ICSI after surgical sperm retrieval in different types of azoospermia.
    Song J, Gu L, Ren X, Liu Y, Qian K, Lan R, Wang T, Jin L, Yang J, Liu J.
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Sep 01; 35(9):1972-1982. PubMed ID: 32730569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.