These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

161 related items for PubMed ID: 34886608

  • 1. [Round window implantation of vibrant soundbridge through a retrofacial approach].
    Li J, Yang L, Wang D, Ren R, Zhao S.
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Nov; 35(11):1023-1027. PubMed ID: 34886608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A retrofacial approach of round window vibroplasty during Vibrant Soundbridge implantation for patients with congenital ear malformation.
    Li J, Wang D, Zhao C, Yang L, Ren R, Zhao S.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Mar; 142():110600. PubMed ID: 33412340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Vibrant Soundbridge implantation via a retrofacial approach in a patient with congenital aural atresia.
    Ikeda R, Hidaka H, Murata T, Miyazaki H, Katori Y, Kobayashi T.
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2019 Apr; 46(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 30201227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Experience with the Vibrant Soundbridge RW-Coupler for round window Vibroplasty with tympanosclerosis.
    Iwasaki S, Suzuki H, Moteki H, Miyagawa M, Takumi Y, Usami S.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 132(6):676-82. PubMed ID: 22385350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Pros and Cons of Round Window Vibroplasty in Open Cavities: Audiological, Surgical, and Quality of Life Outcomes.
    Lassaletta L, Calvino M, Sánchez-Cuadrado I, Pérez-Mora RM, Muñoz E, Gavilán J.
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):944-52. PubMed ID: 25839978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Benefits of active middle ear implants in mixed hearing loss: Stapes versus round window.
    Lee JM, Jung J, Moon IS, Kim SH, Choi JY.
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 27560038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Long-Term Stability and Safety of the Soundbridge Coupled to the Round Window.
    Sprinzl GM, Schoerg P, Muck S, Jesenko M, Speiser S, Ploder M, Edlinger SH, Magele A.
    Laryngoscope; 2021 May; 131(5):E1434-E1442. PubMed ID: 33210744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery.
    Streitberger C, Perotti M, Beltrame MA, Giarbini N.
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009 May; 130(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 19813469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Electrocochleography in round window Vibrant Soundbridge implantation.
    Colletti V, Mandalà M, Colletti L.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Apr; 146(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 22140205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Long-term outcome of round window Vibrant SoundBridge implantation in extensive ossicular chain defects.
    Colletti L, Mandalà M, Colletti V.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jul; 149(1):134-41. PubMed ID: 23585147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [The active middle ear implant for the rehabilitation of sensorineural, mixed and conductive hearing losses].
    Sprinzl GM, Wolf-Magele A, Schnabl J, Koci V.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Sep; 90(9):560-72. PubMed ID: 21913153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Round window vibroplasty: long-term results.
    Böheim K, Mlynski R, Lenarz T, Schlögel M, Hagen R.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 132(10):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22779784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Vibrant soundbridge implantation of congenital atresia of oval window(with summary of nine cases].
    Wang DN, Zhao SQ, Li Y, Ma XB, Ren R, Chen XQ, Li YL.
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Apr 20; 31(8):588-589. PubMed ID: 29871320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Consensus statement on round window vibroplasty.
    Beltrame AM, Todt I, Sprinzl G, Profant M, Schwab B.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2014 Oct 20; 123(10):734-40. PubMed ID: 24842869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Oval and round window vibroplasty: a comparison of hearing results, risks and failures.
    Canale A, Dagna F, Cassandro C, Giordano P, Caranzano F, Lacilla M, Albera R.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Oct 20; 271(10):2637-40. PubMed ID: 24114064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Clinical Experience of Vibroplasty With Direct Coupling to the Oval Window Without Use of a Coupler.
    Kwak SH, Moon YM, Nam GS, Bae SH, Kim SH, Jung J, Choi JY.
    Laryngoscope; 2020 Dec 20; 130(12):E926-E932. PubMed ID: 31977072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of Alternative Coupling Methods of the Vibrant Soundbridge Floating Mass Transducer.
    Busch S, Lenarz T, Maier H.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016 Dec 20; 21(6):347-355. PubMed ID: 28068651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Vibroplasty in mixed and conductive hearing loss: comparison of different coupling methods.
    Vyskocil E, Riss D, Honeder C, Arnoldner C, Hamzavi JS, Baumgartner WD, Flak S, Gstoettner W.
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jun 20; 124(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 24338550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cochlear implantation requiring a retrofacial approach to the round window.
    Allen KP, Bartels LJ, Isaacson B.
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Mar 20; 36(3):e84-6. PubMed ID: 25502454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.