These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

117 related items for PubMed ID: 34895075

  • 1. Item-specific encoding reduces false recognition of homograph and implicit mediated critical lures.
    Smith KA, Huff MJ, Pazos LA, Smith JL, Cosentino KM.
    Memory; 2022 Mar; 30(3):293-308. PubMed ID: 34895075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Reducing False Recognition in the Deese-Roediger/McDermott Paradigm: Related Lures Reveal How Distinctive Encoding Improves Encoding and Monitoring Processes.
    Huff MJ, Bodner GE, Gretz MR.
    Front Psychol; 2020 Mar; 11():602347. PubMed ID: 33329270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ, Bodner GE.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1246-56. PubMed ID: 23356241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. List blocking and longer retention intervals reveal an influence of gist processing for lexically ambiguous critical lures.
    Huff MJ, McNabb J, Hutchison KA.
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1193-207. PubMed ID: 26105976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Drawing individual images benefits recognition accuracy in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.
    Namias JM, Huff MJ, Smith A, Maxwell NP.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Aug; 75(8):1571-1582. PubMed ID: 34661459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Item-specific and relational processing both improve recall accuracy in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ, Bodner GE.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1493-1506. PubMed ID: 30188245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Item-specific processing reduces false recognition in older and younger adults: Separating encoding and retrieval using signal detection and the diffusion model.
    Huff MJ, Aschenbrenner AJ.
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1287-1301. PubMed ID: 29959616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Falsely recalled items are rich in item-specific information.
    Burns DJ, Jenkins CL, Dean EE.
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Oct; 35(7):1630-40. PubMed ID: 18062541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effect of early list manipulations on the DRM illusion.
    Fam J, Huff MJ, Westbrook RF, Holmes NM.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Nov; 74(11):1924-1934. PubMed ID: 33840269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The effects of mediated word lists on false recall and recognition.
    Huff MJ, Hutchison KA.
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Aug; 39(6):941-53. PubMed ID: 21336675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Distinctive encoding of a subset of DRM lists yields not only benefits, but also costs and spillovers.
    Huff MJ, Bodner GE, Gretz MR.
    Psychol Res; 2021 Feb; 85(1):280-290. PubMed ID: 31463566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Item-specific processing reduces false memories.
    McCabe DP, Presmanes AG, Robertson CL, Smith AD.
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Dec; 11(6):1074-9. PubMed ID: 15875978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. False recall for people's names in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott Paradigm: conspicuousness and semantic encoding of the critical lure.
    Mukai A.
    Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Dec; 99(3 Pt 2):1123-35. PubMed ID: 15739835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Both differences in encoding processes and monitoring at retrieval reduce false alarms when distinctive information is studied.
    Hanczakowski M, Mazzoni G.
    Memory; 2011 Apr; 19(3):280-9. PubMed ID: 21500088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Categorical and associative relations increase false memory relative to purely associative relations.
    Coane JH, McBride DM, Termonen ML, Cutting JC.
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 26250805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Associative strength or gist extraction: Which matters when DRM lists have two critical lures?
    Oliveira HM, Albuquerque PB, Saraiva M.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):570-578. PubMed ID: 29431007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evidence for adult age-invariance in associative false recognition.
    Pansuwan T, Breuer F, Gazder T, Lau Z, Cueva S, Swanson L, Taylor M, Wilson M, Morcom AM.
    Memory; 2020 Feb; 28(2):172-186. PubMed ID: 31868124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. When true memory availability promotes false memory: evidence from confabulating patients.
    Ciaramelli E, Ghetti S, Frattarelli M, Làdavas E.
    Neuropsychologia; 2006 Feb; 44(10):1866-77. PubMed ID: 16580028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Dissociative effects of orthographic distinctiveness in pure and mixed lists: an item-order account.
    McDaniel MA, Cahill M, Bugg JM, Meadow NG.
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Oct; 39(7):1162-73. PubMed ID: 21584853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items.
    Burns DJ, Martens NJ, Bertoni AA, Sweeney EJ, Lividini MD.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 16569146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.